Technology is inseparable from civilization. It has changed the world forever. Thanks to it, we can - for example - send information to the other end of the world in seconds; talk to people from other continents; travel to any place in the world in one day; store thousands of photos on a drive the size of your thumb; create virtual realities, as well as do a bunch of other things that no one would have imagined just 100 years ago.
But technology has its bad side too. In the current world, it is controlled by organizations which do not have our best interests in mind. They will not hesitate to use technology's great power against us. Spying on - and analyzing - our communication; controlling the information we receive; emotional manipulation; modification of behavior - those are just a few things technology is being used for these days. All that with more coverage, accuracy, effectiveness and with less human effort. It is the technology that enables turning the elites' dream of perfect control over the plebs into reality. If this "progress" is not stopped, we will end up in a prison that we wouldn't find in our worst nightmares.
In this article, I will attempt to describe the way the most important technologies of today contribute to the creation of a global system of control. I will also mention a few technologies of the future, and try to connect all the information together and predict the fate of this world. Let's start with one of the inventions that affect people the most - The Internet.
Every connection - for example sending an instant message, or entering a website - goes through your Internet Service Provider, before it reaches the target. In theory this means ISPs can freely spy on and modify everything you do on the Internet; for example - slow down or block the downloading of torrents; inject advertisements to your visited sites http://zmhenkel.blogspot.com/2013/03/isp-advertisement-injection-cma.html (archive) (MozArchive), or even create a massive censorship system, like the so-called "Great Wall" of China.
The most common usage of the Internet is surely viewing websites, for which we use a web browser such as Google Chrome, Mozilla Firefox, Internet Explorer (or more recently Microsoft Edge) or Opera. The browser becomes the user's "window to the world", but at the same time it also becomes the window through which a big corporation is able to spy on you. At least in theory, the history of viewed sites stands wide open to be grabbed by the spies; yet (as of November 2024), only Opera takes advantage of this ability directly, as far as I've been able to discern. However, such functionality could easily be introduced by the ubiquitous auto-updates (basically an in-built backdoor) at any time. It's also not that big of a save when you realize how much other types of data the common browser leaves with. Mozilla - in particular - learns about basically every interaction you make with its browser through Firefox Glean; the other big ones have their own ways of spying I've also catalogued. The main point here is, that it's extremely easy for this type of software to grab lots of sensitive data for the corporation that develops it, and even for the US government if you're a member of PRISM (like Microsoft and Google), or the Chinese one if you're Opera (owned by a Chinese company).
Websites themselves can (and do) collect information about you independently of the browser. Almost every big website works closely with the police / government and will happily share data about you with them - for example, the IP address of the computer you made a forum post from. Check out an example (archive) (MozArchive) from a bookmark I've randomly picked: We may also transfer and disclose user information, including Personal Information, to third parties: (i) in the event we are required to respond to subpoenas or other legal process or if in our opinion such disclosure is required by law; (ii) at the request of governmental authorities conducting an investigation; [...] We may also use Device Identifiers (e.g., IP addresses) to identify users, and may do so in cooperation with copyright owners, Internet service providers, wireless service providers or law enforcement agencies, in our discretion. These disclosures may be carried out without notice to you
. Exceptions, such as Lavabit (interesting story by the way - you can read it on the Internet) or The Pirate Bay, have their servers raided. Consider how this type of detailed and collaborative spying is possible only through technological development; you could never do this with a newspaper. Once you got it home, you could do what you wanted, and no one would know or be able to punish you for it. This is not an argument against tech in general, but for the fact that we need protections (whether legal or extra-legal AKA controlling the infrastructure) in terms of its abuse by corporations and governments.
Lately, it became fashionable to store your data "in the cloud", for example Dropbox or Google Drive. This is really helpful to the elites - they can now see and analyze your files, which could give them information about your interests or plans (that might be used against you). Many years ago, a guy from 4chan mentioned storing bomb making instructions on Dropbox, only to find that, one day, they have been deleted. The Internet is full of cases like that, and they're not all about bombs. Thus, we can see that your data isn't safe on these cloud "services" - it ceases being yours. Most likely, in several years, wanting to keep your data on your own drive will be considered "abnormal" - and cloud storage will be the standard - like it is today with cash vs bank accounts, for example. This will open the door to complete control of your stored data, automatically blocking materials about - for example - the aforementioned bombs. Another, maybe more plausible option, would be punishing the people who upload such files - like film producers did with people downloading certain torrents. This has already happened in cases of supposed "child sexual abuse images" (archive) (MozArchive):
The man, only identified as Mark by the New York Times, took pictures of his son’s groin to send to a doctor after realizing it was inflamed [...]
When the photos were automatically uploaded to the cloud, Google’s system identified them as CSAM. Two days later, Mark’s Gmail and other Google accounts, including Google Fi, which provides his phone service, were disabled over “harmful content” that was “a severe violation of the company’s policies and might be illegal”
He later found out that Google had flagged another video he had on his phone and that the San Francisco police department opened an investigation into him.
So this guy got dragged into a police investigation and lost his Google accounts (including his phone service) forever (Google refuses to reinstate man’s account [...]
) because he dared to take a naked photo of his own child for medical purposes. If this happened with the supposed CSAM, then it can happen with anything, such as "misinformation", "terrorist materials", or basically anything the elites don't like. Of course, if he simply printed the photo and gave to the doctor, this entire circus show would have been avoided. Google is happy about what they did, BTW:
“We follow US law in defining what constitutes CSAM and use a combination of hash matching technology and artificial intelligence to identify it and remove it from our platforms,” said Christa Muldoon, a Google spokesperson.
Thanks to technology, corporations are able to appoint themselves as the judges of what is acceptable or not. You can lose your accounts with years or decades of valuable information, or - at the worst case - even be thrown into prison. Enjoy your "convenient" tech dystopia.
How do most people find information on the Internet? Using Google, of course. But Google is something more than just a search engine - it's a corporation whose aim is gathering as much data as possible and creating a profile about you. Their spy scripts (for example, google analytics) exist on pretty much every site - you could even not know what Google is, but still be spied on. That data is then used to, for example, show you targeted advertisements, but also different search results. So a Christian searching for "abortion" will see something else than an atheist.
Google went further and invented a new algorithm for displaying search results. The sites which are, according to them, based on "facts" will be higher up. On the other hand, those who contain untrue information (again, according to them) will be further down. One of the ways Google rates the truth value of sites is comparing them with the articles on Wikipedia. And since we know how Wikipedia treats conspiracy theories, we can assume they will pushed away by official versions of events. Soon, when we search for something like "genetically modified organisms" we will only get "prepared" information. Google's invention could become one of the most effective tools of censorship and opinion control. 2024 edit: it has. Check here to see just how bad it is.
Google also controls other common services. One of the most popular is YouTube, which they've been "reforming" since they bought it. I was surprised when a few years ago I couldn't log in to my YouTube account without making a Gmail account. I didn't want their e-mail (which spies on you) so I said goodbye to YouTube. I didn't use it much, but still.
Another YouTube reform is called Content ID. It is supposed to protect copyright. The creator of a movie or song can share their creation with Google, which will then compare it with every other file on YouTube. If it considers one of those files close enough to the submission, it will either delete that file, remove sound from it, or add advertisements.
Before Content ID had been invented, someone who thought that a movie violated copyright, had to send YouTube a form, which could be accepted or not. These days though, they have a much easier way called Content ID, which allows them to earn money if it finds some similarities. You can theoretically appeal a Content ID decision, but it is pointless since the appeal will be decided by...the same company that uploaded the file. Many frustrated people are complaining in internet comments, saying that Content ID is terrible, that it made a mistake with their movie, that they're stealing their money, that they have lost their files or their account. There've been debates about copyright and AI in general. Some people have said that movie or music creators should be happy to have their content shared on YouTube. But these discussions can exist only because Content ID happened. Without it, people could freely share their movies without them being possibly modified / deleted by automatic analysis.
A similar program could be used to delete movies about undesirable topics. Even now YouTube is deleting "racist", "nationalist", "insulting" films - even if often that is just an excuse; but they have to do it by hand. If they put together Content ID with the site sorting algorithm, they could create a system that deletes certain content automatically. A more advanced form of that algorithm could even delete certain parts of movies which have undesirable topics (for example, deleting a few second long part with a racist slur). It would work similarly to the profanity filters on forums. But it would not be limited only to that - Google has shown that they're very interested in controlling your beliefs, when they've created the site sorting algorithm I spoke about earlier. A tool that could detect where in your movie an undesirable topic is mentioned, and replace it with their modified version, would be very welcome in their arsenal.
You could write a whole book about Google; I don't want to do it - but I have to briefly mention some other things they've done. Recaptcha is the most popular way to defend forums from spambots. If you wanted to write something on a forum with recaptcha, you had to type a certain word. You didn't always get a word, though - you could get something like a street address, which would then get added to Google StreetView, which allows spying on people. For years, anyone who wrote on 4chan, was filling their database with street addresses, while not necessarily knowing about that. What really is StreetView? Google cars travel the world taking pictures of everything and everyone. Then they put these photos in their database, which can be searched by anyone. Google has access to pictures of the whole Earth, pretty much - and even to the history of places people search for using their maps. What could that information be used for? You can read on Wikipedia that a lot of countries had a problem with StreetView. They thought it intrudes on the citizen's privacy. But after "consultations" they've all agreed to allow it. Isn't this evidence that we're dealing with a worldwide plan to spy on people?
They've changed ReCaptcha since I wrote the above. Now, you get a set of pictures and you have to choose the ones containing a certain item, for example hamburgers. This is used to train Google's artificial intelligence, which will also probably be used against us in the future. I will finish this section with a quote from Google - We don't need you to type at all. We know where you are. We know where you've been. We can more or less know what you're thinking about
.
One of the most popular internet sites these days are social networks, such as Facebook or Twitter. People flock to them like flies, filling their databases with information such as name, surname, phone number, place of work, interests, and friend lists. They don't have a problem with sharing their political opinions. Facebook makes it really easy, since the Like!
button appears on most popular websites, and clicking it sends information to Facebook about the article you liked. How could they use that information? For example, for showing targeted advertisements. A few years ago, Facebook promised that it would never do that - but then changed their mind and it is now a reality. Some of these advertisements can be insulting - for example, a person suffering from cancer, after searching for information about it on the internet, was shown ads about...burial services! http://www.naturalnews.com/049386_Facebook_privacy_surveillance.html (archive) (MozArchive)
Comments written on these social networks are even more dangerous. They are attached to your real name, and whoever finds your account can read them. What could be the effects of that? You could lose your job or be arrested. Some examples:
We could be focusing on singular situations - was someone punished appropriately or not? You could even blame the victim. But the logical thing to do is to look at the whole issue from afar. If these comments were made in person, and not on the internet, no one could have gotten in trouble. The possibility of punishing someone is the consequence of the technology that attaches the things you post to your real name. After years of using social networks, anyone will eventually end up saying something that might incriminate him later, even if it was not obvious to him at the moment of writing. Or stated in another way, If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him
- Cardinal Richelieu.
300 employers were asked whether they've checked the profiles of their would-be recruits, and 91% agreed. 69% dismissed an employee because of something he had in his profile. Some of the offending things were: negative opinions about previous employers, photos of using drugs or drinking alcohol, or "inappropriate" photos:
There are also more direct ways that the social networks can affect you. In 2014 Facebook did a psychological experiment that was supposed to show that you can control human minds without knowing them personally, and without their knowledge. 689003 people (who weren't aware of being lab rats) were divided into two groups - one of them was shown only content generating positive emotions, the other - only negative. The more positive content someone saw, the more positively he himself responded. The differences were small, but maybe they could be increased with more drastic measures. For example, showing someone articles about murders or kidnappings. You could also target the content someone was going to be shown individually - based upon the things he's written in his profile, or his browsing history (which Facebook collects through the Like!
buttons). If someone reads a lot of anti-government websites, they would be shown articles about the government doing something bad. Or an anti-GMO person would be shown information about GMOs being legalized somewhere. It is plausible that this experiment opened the door to just this kind of thing. You can read the whole experiment here: http://www.pnas.org/content/111/24/8788.full (archive) (MozArchive).
Facebook also uses an algorithm for detecting faces on photos and automatically adding a name to them. http://www.dailydot.com/technology/facebook-deepface-science/ (archive) (MozArchive). If your name is on at least one photo, every other photo with your face could be detected as you.
More and more human communication is done electronically. A human talking eye to eye is spontaneous. He knows that only the person he's talking to can hear him. Then he brings that attitude towards talking on the phone, which follows different rules - all data about when, where, and to whom you made the call is stored in the provider's database. In most countries, the police has access to the data if they bring a court order. But in Great Britain - the leader of electronic spying - three of four most used providers send all their data to police in real time (archive) (MozArchive). The implications are enormous - the same organization (the police) that is able to fine or punish you, now has access to all your phone calls. People have been locked up for SMS messages before, but usually they had to have their phones physically searched. This requirement disappears with the automatic system of sending messages to the police.
The same is true of internet communication. Most people use common tools like Gmail or Skype. In one of his leaked documents, Edward Snowden revealed that the NSA (National Security of America) has a program called PRISM, with which those companies cooperate. Since 2011, Skype gives access to your conversations to the NSA, including video recording:
Of course, we could use less popular software with an encryption capability, but would that protect us from spying?
David Cameron, the prime minister of Great Britain, came up with an idea to ban encryption (archive) (MozArchive), arguing that There should be no means of communication, which we cannot read
. Some people laughed, saying that the government would have to delete encryption software from people's hard drives for it to work (and would that really be a problem for them? Malware exists, you know). Others thought that they can't implement it, because it would make banking and such insecure. But this looks more like a desperate way to dismiss the possibility that, in the near future, all our conversations done electronically will be spied on by the government.
In another leak of NSA's documents, it was shown that they want to reduce the effectiveness of common encryption:
You don't need to work with a software's creator to spy on our conversations, though. Even in open source software (that anyone with enough knowledge and dedication could theoretically inspect), there still happen bugs that can weaken the encryption. For example, OpenSSL, the most popular library encrypting our communications with websites, for 1.5 years had a bug allowing to download a small amount of data from the memory of the server that it's used on, and that data could include passwords and encryption keys. NSA, of course, took advantage of that: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-11/nsa-said-to-have-used-heartbleed-bug-exposing-consumers (archive) (MozArchive) Another example: Cryptocat screwed up the implementation of an encryption algorithm, which allowed anyone with enough capability to decrypt communication made through it. And NSA has these capabilities - they also save all encrypted communications, so they can decrypt them later.
And they will most likely succeed - there is a huge chance that quantum computers will make all current ciphers irrelevant - https://hackaday.com/2015/09/29/quantum-computing-kills-encryption/ (archive) (MozArchive) - so private conversations will be a thing of the past. Add to that voice recognition software, and we're finding ourselves in a world where all our conversations are scanned for certain phrases (by a program similar to Content ID I've talked about earlier).
Cash payments are more and more often being replaced by electronic ones. People like the comfort of being able to order anything they want and pay for it with a few clicks. Having a bank account is something expected these days, even required. But behind the curtain of convenience, gigantic implications for human privacy and freedom are hidden.
Let's start from the basics - what is electronic money? It's a number in a database on a server belonging to the bank you're using. Your ability to buy anything is dependent on how big that number is - and since humans have to, for example, eat - your life depends on it.
One guy from Cyprus got 720 000 Euros grabbed by the European Commission to pay off Cyprus' debt. He had to fire all his Cypriot employees and move to another country. First, the sum was displayed as "blocked", then they deleted it from his account altogether. And, as he himself says, Thousands of other companies around Cyprus have the same situation
. This shows how much you can rely on a number in a database - all it takes is one impulse in someone's mind, and it's gone. Read more about this situation here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=160292 (archive) (MozArchive)
Another problem with electronic payments is the fact that they are anti-privacy. All your transactions are stored in the bank's database. And the people controlling the bank can use them against you - blocking unwanted transactions, such as buying bitcoins http://www.coindesk.com/dutch-bank-rabobank-blocks-bitcoin/ (archive) (MozArchive) or donations to WikiLeaks: http://www.bankrate.com/finance/credit-cards/naughty-things-credit-card-wont-buy-6.aspx (archive) (MozArchive). It's easy to imagine a world where all your transactions are analyzed and automatically blocked according to a list of banned items.
Paper money does not have that problem. It will not disappear from your pocket. There is no central point that stores information about your transactions. You can't "turn someone off" if he pays with paper money - if someone doesn't want to sell you something, you go somewhere else. Paper money is a tool of the free person - that's why the elites are targeting it.
But you can still use paper money, right? Maybe not for long - they have been trying to get people used to electronic payments for a long time. Advertising bank accounts is commonplace. More and more employers require having a bank account. The limits on the amount you can spend at once with paper money are going down worldwide:
Will they go down to zero? In some places that's already the case; for example, buses in London cannot be paid for in cash (MozArchive) since 2014. On November 8 of 2016, the prime minister of India has eliminated the two largest notes (local) - Shri Narendra Modi made an announcement that the Rs 500 and Rs 1000 notes in circulation would cease to be legal tender
, which instantly shot up the amount of digital payments - the debit card transactions rose by 108% and credit card transactions by 60%
. On the radio he admitted the goal is the complete elimination of paper money - Less-cash first, cashless society next
. In Sweden, payments are almost fully electronic: https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/04/sweden-cashless-society-cards-phone-apps-leading-europe (archive) (MozArchive) - Swedish buses have not taken cash for years, it is impossible to buy a ticket on the Stockholm metro with cash, retailers are legally entitled to refuse coins and notes, and street vendors – and even churches – increasingly prefer card or phone payments
. There are many other examples in different countries, such as Denmark, the USA, etc. The amount of cashless places will keep increasing, and people will eventually become irreversibly tied up in the electronic web of slavery.
The strongest weapon of the technological control system are definitely the CCTV cameras. While you can mostly avoid all the other things (at least for now), the cameras are doing their job just by existing. They were slowly being put into various places - from shops and schools to the streets, buses and flats; you can assume that wherever you move, your life is being stored, watched and analyzed by strangers. I knew a place where some drunks liked to meet up and the spies put a camera in there, which the drunks destroyed. But the next day it was replaced again, so having the cameras up at all times is clearly very important to the spies.
The existence of the spying system completely changes the relations between people and the elites. You can't feel comfortable knowing that your every move is being spied on (by people who can also punish you if you do something they deem "wrong"). Most people don't seem to care though - they buy in shops loaded with cameras and send their children to schools that have cameras. Some are even happy that they are being watched, repeating dumb slogans about "safety", or other excuses that have nothing to do with reality. This attitude is becoming less and less viable because of the increase in capability - and prevalence - of the relevant devices.
Advanced cameras can do much more than just recording video and relying on the human's interpretation. They can spy on a human as he goes from one camera's range to another's, detect faces, mark people according to gender or other criteria:
They can also detect your behavior and mark it as potentially "suspicious". This is already being used in places like India https://www.nice.com/protecting/press-releases/Nanded-India-Deploys-NICE-Safe-City-Solution-to-Protect-Citizens-Visitors-and-Historical-Sites-129 (archive) (MozArchive), Glasgow https://www.nice.com/protecting/press-releases/NICE-Safe-City-Solutions-Deployed-in-Glasgow-to-Bolster-Security-Safety-and-Operations-Management-137 (archive) (MozArchive), and even in the Polish town Katowice http://katowice.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/katowicki-inteligentny-system-monitoringu-i-analizy-czyli,2656606,artgal,t,id,tm.html (archive) (MozArchive)
This system makes absolute slaves out of people. There is a central point in which the police can analyze all the data. One of the "suspicious behaviors" that were being advertised by the CCTV companies was taking out a pistol from your pocket. But anything at all can be considered "suspicious". Let's look at some of the common things that I've seen being banned: selling stuff on the streets, feeding birds, wearing a mask, walking the dog (!), driving without seat belts, etc. Sometimes people get fined for these things, but they have to be found out first by someone who just happened to be looking at the camera, or a police officer randomly passing by. The intelligent monitoring system removes this requirement, letting the psychopathic elites fine anyone for anything they desire, without relying on luck or having to put in excessive effort.
Imagine you're walking through an alley that's loaded with these cameras while eating a sandwich. Then you throw away the bag in which the sandwich was. A camera sees that and assigns you a fine of 50 dollars for littering. Your face has been detected and the path you take is now being watched and sent to the police in real time. A few minutes later the police comes; you're trying to hide but it's impossible, since there are cameras everywhere, and they know your position. In the end, you pay up, the same as anyone who has ever littered. This might look funny at the moment, but the technology already exists to make this scenario a reality, it's just a matter of implementing it. The advertisements for these cameras make it clear - being in the crowd will not protect you. Neither will hiding your face, changing clothes, moving somewhere else, etc. People will for sure try to find a way to bypass this system, and they might even succeed at the beginning - but the algorithms will get better, and will eventually make it impossible to fool them. If this system also connected directly to people's bank accounts, they could even skip the police step entirely, and ensure everyone violating a list of "bad" behaviors is instantly fined. I don't think this is insurmountable or even particularly hard to implement.
There are other technologies, which have been recently invented, that in the future will fuel the control system. Pretty much every new invention has the potential to do that (or even is invented for this reason), but I will try to cover the most important ones.
There is a massive campaign all over the world to put chips in people's pets, allegedly to "be able to find them", but actually the point is to get people used to the idea of chipping. And then they will chip the people. In some bars or workplaces they are already being used to, for example, open doors; after enough propaganda they will be injected in every child that is born. They will replace ID cards, credit cards, and other current documents. They will be required in more and more places, and you won't be able to satisfy basic needs (such as shopping) without them. Why do the elites want to chip the people so bad? Because it will allow them to create a gigantic database containing the time and place of every person. This has already been tried in some American schools, for example: http://www.alternet.org/civil-liberties/kids-tagged-rfid-chips-creepy-new-technology-schools-use-track-everything-kids-do (archive) (MozArchive). The children wear ID cards on their necks, and those cards have the chips in them. Their position is being sent to the school computers in real time, as well as detecting events such as entering or leaving school, buying lunch, or entering the library. It's only a matter of time until we all have them under our skins.
Advertisements have been with us for a long time, even before technology. You can avoid them by installing AdBlock or switching to another TV channel. But you won't be able to hide from an advertisement displayed, for example, on grass or the sky. I thought that's far into the future before I wrote this article, but actually, this has already been tried: https://thefutureofthings.com/5069-nike-launched-a-holographic-3d-advertising-campaign/ (archive) (MozArchive). This could also be used not only to advertise products, but convince people of the reality of certain versions of events.
Already being tested in, for example, California https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-02-01/tesla-is-testing-self-driving-cars-on-california-roads (archive) (MozArchive). And when they will finally be put into roads, we will keep hearing about how safe they are (this already happens, but will be much more common). When people finally get convinced of the safety of these cars, regular cars will be banned since they are allegedly less safe than the computer-controlled ones. So we will be able to drive only according to the path the computer chooses, which will of course also be stored in the global database. Cars without a steering wheel (that already exist) will also prevent fleeing from the police.
The final aim of the technological control system is putting together all these tools to allow full control of humanity. To use the Internet, you will have to give your real name (or maybe flash a microchip?) - so everything we do there will be connected to our real person. All encrypted connections and conversations will be decrypted on the fly and analyzed. Freely downloading torrents or even making jokes like "die in a fire" will be a thing of the past. All the information you receive will be controlled - similar to what Facebook and Google already do, but globally.
Our physical position will be tracked by cameras and microchip scanners which will be in places such as shops, airports, flats, etc. So our movements will be analyzed in real time - but not by people, like it is now, but by AI (or even robots, farther in the future). You won't be able to flee from this system - they will even spy on the homeless (there were already programs to find and catalogue the homeless' position, allegedly to help them, but it really was about the spying). Maybe they will soon put cameras in their favorite places, if they aren't already doing that. December 17 revision: heh, they ARE already doing that - https://techcrunch.com/2017/12/13/security-robots-are-being-used-to-ward-off-san-franciscos-homeless-population/ (archive) (MozArchive). Didn't think it would get there so fast!
Paper money will fully disappear. All our transactions will be connected to our real name, as everything else. There will be a giant, worldwide database storing the physical position of every person, as well as everything she has ever done, said, wrote, bought...All her movements will, of course, be analyzed in real time by AI. I think the technology for all that already exists - so this is a social or logistical problem, not a technological one. How long will it take the elites to install all that, and get people used to slavery? I have no idea. But one thing is for sure: the comfortable life that you're used to, will be only a happy memory soon.
UPDATE 2022: somehow I felt like updating this, since I think I failed to make my main point as effectively as I wanted to. So, imagine a video game character, like Mario. By interacting with the game, we can check how high he can jump, how long does it take him to reach full running speed, what kinds of enemies he can stomp on and which he can't, etc. Since Mario is just a program running on our computers / consoles, we can learn all that he can do at any moment. His jump height is a constant, so we can theoretically calculate whether he can hit some block, or in how much time (in-game frames) a certain enemy will reach us. More than that - by knowing the particulars of the game, we can decide what's the best course of action 5 levels down the road.
This is, in fact, how extremely precise speedruns are created. For simple games like Super Mario Bros, they are already very optimized, almost down to a single step. But the same rules apply to even complex games like JRPGs. Picking up a certain item early on can allow you to do something 2 hours later. Learning a certain skill that's weak at the beginning can allow you to kill the final boss in one hit. Running from a battle can set a RNG-dependent variable to a certain optimal value, etc. To a regular player, these strategies might seem stupid in the short term, but they finalize in the best possible route in the end. It is not just about speedruns, but any kind of challenge runs, etc. will require deep knowledge and long term analysis of the game mechanics to perform.
Now what if I told you that reality is the video game in question? Imagine - your location is already known by your smartphone, or car, or a web of CCTV, or a combination of those. Your deepest darkest desires are known by your search engines, your network of friends by the social media services, etc. Just this alone enables huge knowledge, prediction and control abilities (this has been described in the previous sections). But imagine we go deeper with microchips, thought readers, smart cities and stuff like that. With increasing technology, we become more like the video game character.
To reach that level, we require three things. First is the technology that allows us precise enough data collection. Second is powerful computers that enable calculations fast enough to predict outputs based on inputs long ahead in time (what chess engines already do, but in a much more complicated system). The third is the technology that allows us to push switches - the way a keyboard or joystick does in a video game device. See, we're still physical beings, dependent on things like genes expressing themselves, neurons firing, hormones entering a cell to cause certain changes, etc. All of this could be theoretically controlled by technology. Even now, with the relatively simple switches that we have, we can already cause depression in social media users by showing them certain stories. We can get people to buy things thanks to AI-determined direct advertisements, etc. Imagine if we got down to the level of the cell!
And the elites are surely working on such a technology as we speak. I mean, what do you think the mRNA vaccines are? What do you think will happen when the analysis and control ability reaches Mario's level? Consider the fact that right now they do not mind using all the available technology against us to the fullest extent. No brakes against CCTV, iris scanning, and all the other mentioned things exist. This implies that for any new slavery tech, there won't be ones, either.
And this is why we need the physical infrastructure soon. If the world is controlled by evil actors (as it is right now) and they have all this capability (which we don't), including direct cell access, God help us. The higher the technology, the bigger the power difference between us and the elites. Resistance will not be possible anymore when technology reaches such a level (which I would guess takes no more than a few decades). Imagine them being able to show a graph of your most likely movements according to the information they already have, in real time, and use it against you. How can you resist, when the computers can predict what you're going to do on Level 6 of the reality game - and push a switch to deny or change it? You will never do anything other than what the elites (or the AI, if it is given control and goes rogue) allow. And since the technological development isn't going to stop, we need to take over right now.