Contact me for feedback or questions! I reply to everyone.
Pathology is science, pandemic is politics- Introduction -
December 30, 2019. Li Wenliang, a doctor at the Wuhan Central Hospital, told his colleagues that 7 people were diagnosed with SARS infections that were traced back to the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market, and that precautions should be taken. A few days later, Li was "educated" by the police to "not spread rumors". In the end, he was proven right - patients were coming in with a "new type of coronary pneumonia" and one of them even infected him on January 12 (translation graciously provided by the Big G botnet):
I was very worried at first, but the doctor would comfort me every day when I went to the ward. I am no longer feverish, and my mental state is better than a few days ago. I believe the hospital and the doctor, I will definitely be cured.
After recovering, I want to quickly return to the front line and continue to see the patient.
So he was on his way to health. His parents also got infected and fully recovered:
My parents also had fever and other symptoms after me. The lung CT showed ground-glass lesions. They are being treated in other hospitals in Wuhan, but they are all fine now, without any problems
However, he ended up dying (archive), even though he wasn't in the age group (34) that dies from corona:
UPDATE: these are early figures and have now been proven terribly wrong. Despite that, even according to those, Li should not have died. Here are the updated ones. His parents - aged over 60 (with a significantly higher, but still extremely low death rate) - have been able to recover
without any problems. EDIT: I'm deleting the part about the photos, it might not be right and it's not that relevant, anyway. Well, let's dig deeper into the more important parts of this case:
October 18, 2019. A New York City hotel is holding a pandemic drill (archive) which is supposed to educate the world leaders on what to do if such a situation arose in real life. You can check out the full list of participants here (archive) - for now, just note that it contained people both from the USA and China. The highlight video of the event mentions stuff such as:
Literally everything stated in the video has later happened in the real world. But the single piece of evidence that seals the deal is the fact that they mentioned a novel coronavirus right at the start - instead of any one of the hundreds other possible infections (archive). How could they have known, if this wasn't planned in advance? They said (archive) that this wasn't
a prediction and that the simulation was based on SARS (archive) (also a coronavirus) - but again, why not any of the other
possible infections? And why did they get everything else right? These vermin have engineered this so-called pandemic and now - by saying
it's a coincidence, lol -
are mocking us right into our faces.
The amount of reported COVID cases is the first number upon which the "pandemic" was built on. Generally, it depends on the results of PCR tests. A PCR test is a tool that checks whether you have a certain genetic sequence in your body (in this case, a part of the COVID genetic sequence). Every PCR test is set at a certain cycle threshold, which just means the amount of times you amplify the sequence you are trying to find. This means that, the higher the cycle threshold, the more people will be found positive (less amount of virus sequence in the body will trigger the test). However, less amount of virus sequence in the body also means less potential to get sick and infect others. The important thing to understand here, is that you can increase or decrease the amount of reported cases just by changing the amount of cycles the tests are run at. To determine the logically optimal amount of cycles to use, we need to find the correlation between the cycle threshold and the infectivity. That's exactly what this study has attempted to do:
This graph shows that you cannot manufacture infectious virus in culture if the sample tested positive at 36 cycles or more. Even the people who tested positive with 30 cycles can only infect others 20% of the time. Now guess what amount of cycles have the authorities used for their tests?
This is only in the UK, but surely, this fraud was repeated worldwide. UPDATE: the same thing has been done in Australia -
reaction is known as a cycle, and usually 35-45 cycles are undertaken. And so, probably every country is in on the fraud. In terms of the UK graph - look at the amount of times figures above 36 appear, even though they are totally unjustifiable scientifically, since those cases cannot infect others. Since the 30-35 range is contagious 3-20% of the time (according to the first graph), the vast majority of cases tested positively with 30 to 45 cycles are fraudulent. And there are a lot of those:
About 30% of overall Covid cases are in the 31-40 CT range, and ~90% of those will be false positives. Even then, that's still the best case scenario for the fearmongers. Because other studies got even more damning results:
SARS-CoV-2 Vero cell infectivity was only observed for RT-PCR Ct < 24
According to this study, anyone with a positive test at 25 cycles or more is not contagious. If we took this study at face value, about 3/4 of the listed COVID cases would be fraudulent. But it gets even worse - according to this paper:
Culture medium presents ideal conditions for a virus to grow and may detect virus that is not present in the quantities required to initiate infection in a human host.
This means that the infectious potential is even lower between humans than in culture, and so the "real" amount of cases drops even more. They clearly wanted as many cases as possible to scare you, and that's why they set up the tests this way. There were already suspicions back in February 2020 that the tests are only 20% accurate (archive).
When the infection rate of the close contacts and the sensitivity and specificity of reported results were taken as the point estimates, the positive predictive value of the active screening was only 19.67%
Of course, the relevance of any of this is all assuming that the test results are being accurately reported. But it turns out that the fearmongers actually double-counted (archive) tens of thousands of them in the UK. I suspect they've done similar things in many other countries, so the overall case amount will be overreported even more. See how easy it is to create a "pandemic" when you control what is reported as a case? Hey, why not? No one can check up on you or punish you.
Either way - any time PCR testing is used - it is assumed that you having some genetic sequence inside your body means you are by definition sick and / or can infect others. Kary Mullis - the inventor of the PCR test - denied this interpretation, however (archive); all a positive result means is that something's there, not that it's necessarily doing something bad. Due to this inherent issue, a Portuguese court has ruled that quarantining (imprisoning) people due to a positive test result is illegal (archive) (translation by a friend ^_^):
the diagnosis as to the existence of a disease, in relation to each and every person, is a matter that cannot be made by Law, Resolution, Decree, Regulation or any other normative way. Any diagnosis or any actof health surveillance carried out without prior medical observation violates Regulation No. 698/2019, of 5.9, as well as the provisions of article 97 of the Statute of the Order of Doctors, being liable to constitute the crime of usurpation of functions by article 358 b, of the Penal Code. Any person or entity that issues an order, the content of which leads to deprivation of physical freedom, ambulatory, of others that does not fit the legal provisions, namely in the provisions of article 27 of the CRP, will be making an illegal detention. By decision of 08/26-2020, the request for habeas corpus was granted, as it was illegal to detain them, determining the immediate restitution of the Claimants' freedom.
But hey, there is more (as usual). Sometimes other, even less reliable methods have been used to inflate the stats. Early on in the pandemic China added a bunch of cases entirely due to symptoms -
On Wednesday, the province started including the number of clinically diagnosed cases in the total number of new confirmed cases, which added 13,332 cases to the provincial total; this is even less reliable than the PCR test, as it's not specific - many COVID symptoms are repeated across other diseases. Texas did something similar (archive) -
DSHS is adding case counts for probable cases statewide and by county. Probable cases are those identified through antigen testing or a combination of symptoms and a known exposure without a more likely diagnosis.. And yet, this is the statistic the elites chose to scare you with. The trickery, though, didn't stop at the testing:
Imagine you have in your hand a gun that can only kill people that wear green elf hats - it does absolutely nothing to anyone else. And even then - you'd have to wait weeks until the elf hat enthusiasts would maybe die. Wouldn't you think that is weird? Wouldn't you begin to wonder if - perhaps - it is those hats that kill their wearers, and not your weapon? If real guns worked that way, absolutely no one would buy such a piece of crap. Yet, that is exactly what COVID-19 does - except that the hat is replaced with chronic diseases and age (archive):
As you can see, it's almost impossible to die from corona without those pre-existing diseases. Italy, which has had the highest death rate out of all the countries - provides even stronger evidence for my thesis. According to Silvio Brusaferro (archive) - head of Italy's health institute - not one of the over 4000 deaths has been confirmed to be exclusively from corona:
Rome, 13 mar 19: 12- (Agenzia Nova) - people who died from coronavirus in Italy, who had no other pathologies, could be only two. This is what appears from the medical records examined so far by the Istituto superiore di sanità, according to the president of the Institute, Silvio Brusaferro, during the press conference held today at the Civil Protection in Rome. "Positive deceased patients have an average of over 80 years - 80.3 to be exact - and are basically predominantly male"
Only two people were not at the moment carriers of pathologies, but even in these two cases, the examination of the records is not concluded and could, therefore, emerge causes of death other than COVID-19.
Translation graciously provided by the Yandex botnet. So, not only were the people who died old (look at the chart at the top of this report to realize anyone under age 60 is pretty much immune), but they've also all had chronic diseases - both massive causes of death that certainly don't need help from some puny virus. The deaths are also almost all from heavily polluted areas (archive) - yet another contributing factor independent of corona. Anytime someone gets sick or dies, there is a multitude of contributing factors that control the progression of the situation. But - in the chase for a high COVID death statistic - this common sense understanding has been completely ignored and everything blamed on the mighty virus.
More recent evidence shows hospitals in the US are actually paid for putting COVID-19 on the death certificates (archive). Also, it seems flu deaths have almost completely disappeared (archive) this year, just like that. Of course, it's because they've been reassigned to nCov. If you think that's bad, wait until you see how the United Kingdom counts its coronavirus deaths:
That's right! If you get tested positive, then fall of a ladder (archive), you're a COVID death case. Example is from Croatia; I suspect they've done this kind of stuff everywhere, just only the UK government bothered to spill it. UPDATE November 2022: oh by the way, we have yet another example of fakery - Finland:
It means that a whopping 14% of the reported covid deaths didn't actually have anything to do with covid after all.
The average age for people who have died of covid in Finland is 85 years old. 85 years old. Can you guess what the average life expectancy is in Finland for the population as a whole? It is 82.
Again, COVID is blamed for killing people that could have been killed by a breeze. UPDATE November 2022: hey, I have something even better. You can calculate your risk of dying from corona; I just did a test run of a young lean white guy with diabetes, coronary heart disease, liver cirrhosis and asthma. The results:
So - if someone with 4 chronic diseases can't manage to die from COVID (1 in 100 000 chance) - should you (a presumably healthy young person), worry? And remember, that this is based on the UK data; if you are in Africa, Belarus or any place with lower death rates - the risk will be even more laughable. Was there a point to any of the scaremongering? Was there a point to any of the restrictions, even if you believe they work (and they don't)? Also lol:
The QCovid tool may only be used in Great Britain by clinically trained professionals, for academic research and for the purpose of peer review.
How dare the plebs gain some knowledge without the approval from their masters. UPDATE December 2022: Hey, let's compare COVID to other diseases. According to the WHO, 6,656,601 died from COVID up until now (December 24):
That's 3 years, and with fudged stats (but we will give the benefit of doubt to the scaremongers for now). On the other hand - in only one year (2020) - diabetes has killed more people:
The International Diabetes Federation reported 6.7 million deaths worldwide among adults with diabetes in 2021
If you extrapolated that, it would be 3 times more deaths than during the whole 3 years COVID has been around. And yet, have you ever heard the mainstream media "informing" you about how many people died a certain day from diabetes, all day every day? Of course you didn't, and just by this you should realize the "reporting" was meant to propagandize you. And remember that diabetes is doing this kind of damage every year for decades, instead of only since 2020 like COVID - yet that isn't enough for the media to care, proving it's not about your health. How about cancer?
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide, accounting for nearly 10 million deaths in 2020.
Again extrapolating, it would be 30 million in those 3 years of COVID, which is almost five times more. Of course, those diseases have been ignored during the "pandemic" because they could not be used to install any kind of restrictions (in fact, their sufferers have been left to rot with the denied doctor visits). Funnily enough, the WHO says this:
Around one-third of deaths from cancer are due to tobacco use, high body mass index, alcohol consumption, low fruit and vegetable intake, and lack of physical activity.
Now where was that during COVID? I don't remember hearing it from mainstream media - only scaremongering about "the number" and trying to imprison you in your house and inject venom into your arm. Of course, they could not have emphasized that lifestyle or environmental factors affect your COVID disease severity and death risk, because the destruction of freedom and the induction of mental changes was the point of the pandemic in the first place. And accomplishing the task would not have been possible if people believed they could actually do something aside from hiding like cockroaches under the fridge.
As we can see, the COVID gun is full of dummy bullets; it can only seem powerful by plagiarising the deaths caused by other viruses, diseases, pollution, age or really any cause. The elites have masterfully ignored all those other issues just so they could throw around the COVID label everywhere and come up with as high of a number as possible (and they still coudn't beat diabetes, cancer or heart disease). The appearance of a pandemic was created by constant repetition of those numbers in the minds of people - even though many chronic diseases have had much more impact and for longer, and it is the chronic disease that makes you susceptible to COVID anyway. This is the way the broken gun was then used to shut down the world (which was the actual point, instead of your health). Okay, let's go for strike three against corona, which is its alleged extreme contagion:
What would you guess is the probability of catching the virus if you live with someone who already has it? According to the media hype, you'd think it's pretty much a certainty. And yet the WHO's report tells a different story:
preliminary studies ongoing in Guangdong estimate the secondary attack rate in households ranges from 3-10%
What about non-family specific close contacts?
As of 17 February, in Shenzhen City, among 2842 identified close contacts, 2842 (100%) were traced and 2240 (72%) have completed medical observation. Among the close contacts, 88 (2.8%) were found to be infected with COVID-19.
As of 17 February, in Sichuan Province, among 25493 identified close contacts, 25347 (99%) were traced and 23178 (91%) have completed medical observation. Among the close contacts, 0.9% were found to be infected with COVID-19.
As of 20 February, in Guangdong Province, among 9939 identified close contacts, 9939 (100%) were traced and 7765 (78%) have completed medical observation. Among the close contacts, 479 (4.8%) were found to be infected with COVID-19.
So, 38274 people - who were all in close contact with someone infected - were tested in three different locations, and the overall rate of contagion was a puny 3.1%. To better visualise this: imagine a corona-infected person shaking hands with 100 different people - only 3 of them will catch the virus. Of course, the types and durations of "close contacts" will be different, but you can expect the average contagion rate to be about 3%. For a practical example, check this (archive).
Summarizing: 350 people were traveling from Wuhan to Toronto; one of them was positive for corona (confirmed through 2 different tests, each repeated twice). The flight lasted 15 hours, and despite there being 25 close contacts with the infected person, not one of them caught the virus. UPDATE: found another very well done study (archive) which supports low contagion. What the authors did was trace the close contacts of the 100 corona-infected people, locked them up after the last time they've met up during the study period, and checked if they got sick. What were the results?
In this case-ascertained study of 100 cases of confirmed COVID-19 and 2761 close contacts, the overall secondary clinical attack rate was 0.7%
Amazing - the killer virus can't even muster enough strength to infect 1 person per 100. Anyway - for honesty's sake - the study mostly tested only the people who actually got symptoms. But if the killer virus is sitting in your body harmlessly, what's the problem? Shouldn't the point be to avoid disease instead of a label? However, they did test even some asymptomatic people:
For high-risk populations, including household and hospital contacts, RT-PCR was performed regardless of symptoms.
For family and household, the contagion rate was somewhat higher - about 5%. This is still 95 out of 100 people living together with a COVID-19 case who will avoid infection. What about some studies that appear to show higher rates? Let's check one out (archive):
The secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 in household is 16.3%
Oh no, 16%! I'm already hiding under my bed. This study measured only household infections, so it has no relevance to random outside "close contacts". Anyway, even the 16% isn't valid when you consider this gem:
The quarantined contacts who had symptoms were inspected at least 4 times by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR until their tests were positive.
Hahahahaha. So, the way they got this contagion rate is thanks to fraud. Literally - repeat the test until we get the results we want. Thanks for the admission. But how many journalists will pick this bit up? And how many studies just completely avoid mentioning such information? But I digress. Anyway, when a study is properly done (the previous one only had one test per person), COVID-19 fails to show an infectivity worth worrying about. Recall, also, that the virus does not spread by touching surfaces (archive) despite what the authorities were scaring us with all this time. Now, to be quite honest, some studies found different results:
There are some problems with them though. First of all, they are done in experimental conditions - temperature and many other parameters are kept constant, which doesn't have much to with what happens in real life. Second, and maybe more damning to the narrative - is how the ability of COVID-19 to survive on surfaces - even if just in experimental conditions - isn't any higher than the previous SARS. And the old virus has only infected 8000 people (archive) worldwide - and that's without a lockdown - so it's obvious that touching surfaces cannot be a route for the spread of COVID-19. As usual, the evidence allegedly proving the danger of corona ends up shooting the fearmongers in the foot, and confirming that the pandemic is fake.
Okay, so it's obvious they ran a scare campaign based on nonexistent, bad or fake data. Let's put the final nail in the coffin for the official narrative so we can move on to more important stuff:
Recently a claim is being spread (archive) that Sweden has the highest COVID-19 death rate in the world because of their weak response to the pandemic. Let us analyze it and we'll see that - contrary to supporting the fearmongers policies - it totally destroys them. First, let's check out Sweden's restrictions (archive):
primary schools remain open, borders are only partially closed, there are no compulsory quarantines or shutdowns of restaurants, bars, or public spaces
I'd say Sweden's response was much saner than the other countries'. After all, in most places coronavirus transmission simply doesn't happen (archive). However, social distancing was still recommended and public gatherings of more than 50 people banned. What were the results? As of writing this (June 22), Sweden has 10 097 695 people living in it; 385 695 of them were tested for coronavirus. Of those tested, 56 043 (14.5%) came out positive. Belarus, on the other hand - has a population of 9 449 390. They tested 876 639 people for COVID-19 (more than twice the amount of Sweden) and 59 023 (6.7%) of those came out positive. So, very similar population size and yet Belarus has less than half coronavirus cases. Here's a worldometer screenshot so that no one claims I've made up the data:
Anyway - why is this significant? Because Belarus' response to the coronavirus was even weaker than Sweden's! They've pretty much completely ignored COVID-19 (archive) - schools were closed only for two additional weeks, businesses stayed open, sports were still being played (AFAIK, the only country in the world to do so), and even a huge military parade was held (archive) with most participants not wearing masks. If the rate of infection depended on the severity of lockdown, we would expect Belarus to rank way above Sweden - yet it's the opposite (again, less than half the cases). Comparing to some other countries - in Spain, 5.7% of people who get tested turn out to have the virus. Belgium - 5.5%; Netherlands - 9%; Switzerland - 6.1%; Germany - 4%; France - 8%; Turkey - 6.3%. So, Belarus (6.7%) is right in line with countries that have had huge lockdowns. Brazil is another funny example - 45% people tested have COVID-19 despite all the restrictions. Let that sink in - it's pretty much irrefutable evidence that the lockdowns were pointless and have nothing whatsoever to do with the amount of infections. Of course, this also kills any computer model which relied on the recommended measures being effective (e.g the Imperial College model). Though it's the amount of actual cases that matters more (since the lockdowns should have prevented contagion, but didn't) - the original claim was about death rates, so let's check those out:
According to the June 9 worldometer data (archive) - Sweden's death rate is a little over 10% of all corona cases! This has been used by the media as proof (archive) that it's their lax response which has caused the deaths. Let's bust that claim right open:
Similar to Italy - it's just old people yet again. I suspect a bunch of "co-morbidities" as well, but I don't think we have such great data proving that as from Italy. However, I managed to dig up an interesting quote (archive):
Data includes deaths with a confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis where the cause of death isn't attributed to COVID-19.
And so, it is very likely that - as in Italy - all these old people are simply dying from the diseases they've already had. Comparing with Belarus (June 9 data cause I don't want to redo the calcs):
Can't make this up. 49,453 cases and only 276 deaths gives a death rate of 0.55 percent per coronavirus case. So, only one out of 200 infected people will die from it. I wonder how would the fearmongers squirm out of these damning statistics? They totally kill the "Sweden's lack of lockdown is causing all these deaths" theory. As well as all the models and predictions that have been provided. After all, pretty much every other country has implemented draconian measures to combat COVID-19 - and they still come out much higher than Belarus in the amount of casualties. E.g the UK has 14%, Spain 9.4%, Greece a little over 6%, etc (UPDATE November 2022: these percentages are obviously irrelevant now, they are all much lower [most countries under 2%, and even that is fudged by the fakery from the death section] - just in case someone is scared of those statistics). Funny how the country with the least restrictions also ends up with the smallest death percentage. UPDATE June 2022: I've checked this recently again, and it's still true. The countries with significant restrictions still had higher (but still low, and let's remember the fakery from the Death section) death rates according to stats, while Belarus with none had 0.6%. So the restrictions have been conclusively proven useless in terms of curbing the deaths. Of course, the stat that (again) matters more is the amount of actual cases - I suspect the high death rates are just propaganda claims. Think about it: why would the same virus suddenly kill twenty times more people that have it, just because it's another country? Maybe they get better treatment in certain places, but I doubt Belarus is the king in that department; and anyway, the difference should not be so huge. Or, those countries could simply have more deadly variants of coronavirus - but then, it would be a lie to consider all those together as a single COVID-19 and would also kill the narrative. The simplest and most likely explanation is that Belarus' stats show the maximum true death rate of corona when reported accurately - the other countries are simply faking it (see Italy again). On the other hand - as long as the tests being used have similar accuracy - the amount of cases should go down as restrictions go up. Yet that has been totally reversed in this comparison. This is such a big blow to the mainstream narrative that we could end the report right here. But of course there's much more to say, so let's dig further:
That's literally fake news - journalists went to those hospitals, and saw no one there (archive). For more see here (archive). Of course, it's not like hospitals being overcrowded never happened before (archive) regardless of COVID-19. UPDATE: actually, it seems the hospitals are overloaded every year, so corona did nothing special as usual:
But were they really healthy? Many young people are not so healthy anymore (archive) and many chronic diseases develop without symptoms (archive) until in advanced stage. I doubt the doctors have been subjecting all those victims to a battery of tests which would have shown early heart disease, pre-diabetes, hormone abnormalities, low vitamin levels, etc. Besides, the media is faking those claims (archive) too. A healthy 16 year old woman dies - now how do we turn this into a coronavirus death? First test came out negative, second as well...finally, the third one was positive. There, we've got the young corona death we were looking for!
I'll let this chart speak for itself. Old stats, but remember that the claim was already made back then. Even if you multiply the deaths by a factor of ten, nCov just barely passes the norovirus. It is still weaker than the flu and has 7 other infections above it - which of course do not get spoken about in the media.
These predictions are based on computer modeling which is simply software that runs a simulation based on the assumptions built into it. To make it work, you need to input the relevant real world data, such as how long the virus takes to infect someone else, the percentage of people that will be infected on average, the death rates, the possible measures and treatments taken, etc. If any one of those assumptions is wrong, the whole thing falls like a house of cards. For an analogy, imagine a video game where you double the player's jump height. You can now access areas you couldn't before, get items you couldn't before, slay or jump over enemies you couldn't before. With just one small modification, the game balance goes out the window; the game is broken. And the exact same thing happens with computer modeling - a wrong assumption and the model becomes useless. Anyway, here's the infection data used for the Imperial College model (archive):
And now what the real data turned out to be:
Clearly, we can see that they seriously overestimated the danger of corona. And that's just one assumption among a bunch of others that need to be on point for the model to mean anything. Biology is, of course, extremely complicated and we can't really know most of this with good enough accuracy. Here's something else the model says:
We predict that school and university closure will have an impact on the epidemic, under the assumption that children do transmit as much as adults, even if they rarely experience severe disease 12,16 .
We now know that asymptomatic spread pretty much doesn't happen (archive), and kids just don't get sick with COVID. When applied to Sweden (archive), the model turned out to be completely useless, as expected. And yet, the UK's lockdowns were based on this turd.
First of all, various
studies show that most so-called COVID-19 cases are asymptomatic. Of course, there are the usual caveats about the accuracy of the tests; but - just because
you allegedly have corona - doesn't mean you're going to get any disease. The usual symptoms (archive) attributed to COVID-19 are extremely common in other diseases -
infectious or not. Chronic disease like diabetes (archive) can cause the loss of smell and taste - and as we know, most
so-called COVID-19 patients do have co-morbidities. This is just another case of attributing everything to the mighty virus without proof. Later they've tried to tack on yet more
symptoms onto COVID-19, such as diarrhea (archive) - which is again extremely common and could be the result of
something like poisoning. UPDATE: now the virus of destruction also causes neurological symptoms (archive). Of course, no proof is provided in the study and in fact they admit that the patients were not confirmed to have COVID-19 -
Only seven patients had a CSF examination and none had a pleocytosis and none had detectable SARS-CoV-2 RNA detected by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. As we can see, COVID-19 has simply become a convenient label under which you can throw absolutely any disease with not a shred of proof so that your fearmongering campaign works
better. I don't mean to say that COVID symptoms don't exist, but that since the beginning, everything has been blamed on it without good enough evidence.
Lots of new info recently came out about the vaccines, so I made them their own section.
Obvious fake news made up in order to install more travel bans. There's no way the fearmongers themselves could have known the new variant is any more infectious so fast. They admit that much themselves (archive):
"We do not know the extent to which this is because of the new variant but no matter its cause we have to take swift and decisive action which unfortunately is absolutely essential to control this deadly disease while the vaccine is rolled out."
A study came out on December 23, alleging that the new variant is 56% more infectious (archive). And yet the flights were banned earlier (archive), so the
swift and decisive action was based on absolute zero evidence.
Around 60 countries have now banned or severely restricted arrivals from the UK
the total suspension of flights also affects essential journeys, business travel and other trips that were previously still allowed under UK and local restrictions.
Recall the failed Imperial College model? They've had much more time to develop that one and yet, it was proven terribly wrong anyway. I suspect the infection estimates of this new variant will turn out to be bullshit, as well. They fearmongers are already spreading predictions of doom though:
Our estimates suggest that control measures of a similar stringency to the national lockdown implemented in England in November 2020 are unlikely to reduce the effective reproduction number Rt to less than 1, unless primary schools, secondary schools, and universities are also closed. We project that large resurgences of the virus are likely to occur following easing of control measures. It may be necessary to greatly accelerate vaccine roll-out to have an appreciable impact in suppressing the resulting disease burden.
Which is the whole point of this fraudulent new variant. Spread fear, then increase the lockdowns and push vaccines. UPDATE January 2023: I want to talk more about variants in general. Everything in biology has variants (like people, dogs, trees, other viruses, etc). They have to, because that's how genetics work. It does not mean anything though unless you prove that the variants are somehow special - but the mainstream never does that. Already in March 2020 (archive) 40 COVID variants were found in Iceland and yet none of that materialized into anything relevant (Iceland has some of the lowest COVID death stats). But yet, focusing on yet another "variant" (and giving it scary names like Kraken - archive) can keep the fear perpetual, which is the point. Even if there is no more danger than from any of the other coronas -
Scientists haven't noticed a significant change in symptoms with XBB.1.5 but it is showing a "transmission advantage," said Otto. (is there any actual evidence of the
transmission advantage, like some studies showing increased contagion?). It's the same trick the elites have tried to pull in 2020 with the UK variant.
You mean just like all these scientists (archive)? This is
just an age old tactic of defining your critics out of existence, so you can claim the monopoly on truth and policy. It's used all the time by vaccinators, global warming
peddlers, neo-darwinists, drug pushers, and many other priests of the orthodoxy. But, there's no substance to it - it's just censorship / mob rule with a lipstick called
science, by the way, proceeds precisely because it is challenged, not mindlessly worshipped!
This one usually goes like:
There were (insert amount) of excess deaths in the year 2020 compared to 2019. The coronavirus provides a perfect explanation. Checkmate, denier! This is
usually used in the context of the US (which has had 350K more
deaths (archive) in 2020 than expected), but also the UK and sometimes others. The argument sounds convincing on the surface, but falls apart upon closer examination. This is because it relies
on the fraudulently counted death statistics which consider chronic disease deaths, flu deaths, old age deaths, or even unrelated deaths as coronavirus deaths. So, when
you realize that, all you're left with is a bunch of unaccounted deaths for the year which could be from anything. What was the other common thing between the countries which have excess
deaths? The coronavirus response, of course. We know that it increases suicides, poverty and decreases doctor visits for anything other than corona, so that could explain a
part of it. Otherwise, it could be any other cause, including something new that we will only discover years later. The point is, we can't use corona as an explanation for the excess deaths
when we know the stats have not been accurately collected. UPDATE: ha! The detailed data for most countries is now in - and as usual, it reveals yet another beautiful
argument of the doomers as an empty husk. Look:
It turns out that the US is a pretty unique case where the amount of 2020 deaths was significantly higher than all the previous 20 years. The UK was similar, but even there you can see that the death rate isn't anything different than what they've had in 2000-2003. The other countries are not so forgiving towards the doomer argument. Israel's death rates, for example, have been pretty much the same for the last 12 years, and actually higher from 2000 to 2008. A similar pattern is found in Denmark, Estonia, and Norway. The mocked Sweden with their mild lockdown did in fact have an increase of deaths compared to the previous year, but it disappears when you look a few years prior, so it could be simply explained as natural variation. Yet another huge hope for the fearmongers has been dashed from right in front of their faces! UPDATE: France and the Netherlands also had some increases. But again, most countries took Covid on the chin (no significant spikes in death in 8 out of 12), so the focus should be on determining the factors that made the others fare worse. None of the people that made this argument cared to do that, though - being blinded by fearmongering propaganda.
Okay, so they lied about pretty much everything in regards to the novel coronavirus. But surely, it still exists. Wouldn't it be nice to know how it came about?
For the longest time, I have ignored and / or downplayed this theory for a few reasons. The evidence was not decisive at the beginning and I did not want to make a blunder. Focusing on the virus' origins can also easily be used to distract from the fact that it is still weak and that the restrictions are useless and vaccines harmful. However, enough good evidence came in that the lab origin can't be denied anymore. I must also admit that I have made a mistake in perception here, because if you think about it, everything is downstream from the virus' origins. So the issue is more important than I originally portrayed it.
The lab origin of COVID ties everything together. It explains why the elites knew it was going to be a "coronavirus pandemic" during Event-201. It allowed them to plan everything in advance: all the restrictions, the media attack on alternative treatments, maybe bribing some scientists or threatening some politicians. And of course it gave them an excuse to launch immediate vaccine production, because they needed a virus that would cause some relevant symptoms at least sometimes - which COVID does (even if only in already compromised people). They could not have relied on unpredictable Nature to do what they wanted, at the time they wanted - so they did it themselves. After all, Nature could have created a virus from some completely different family, or one that is so weak that it wouldn't be noticed - which would destroy all their preparations. Now let's check out the evidence for the lab leak theory:
So, the virus was indeed created in a lab. There is no other way to explain all of the above. If even the fact checkers have run away with their tails under their legs, you know something's up (it's the first and last time I've seen something like this). You might be wondering why the mainstream media haven't censored this story. Well, two reasons: first, the evidence was just too strong and you can't bury something like this at that point. Second, the lab leak still helps the elites achieve their goals if they convince you that COVID is a killer. Because, the tougher COVID seems, the more restrictions they have an excuse to implement (and the lab leak does make COVID look tough).
Of course, to attentive readers, none of this should provide a justification for the hysteria that was launched. Remember that we still have an immune system that can kill every single bacteria and virus in existence - including the mighty COVID-19 (archive) or even salmonella (archive). If this wasn't the case - and we required a vaccine for every new pathogen that might appear (and this happens all the time (archive)) - anyone who didn't get it would just die. We have survived on this Earth for millions of years, and for a lot of that time, there was no handwash, antibiotics, masks or stuff like that. Yet we're still here today, because our immune system is very effective at its job. However, certain things (that are - surprise surprise - very common in industrialized societies) can weaken it. These include nutrient deficiencies such as vitamins A, C and D (archive), refined sugar (archive), industrial seed oils (archive) and psychological stress (archive).
This theory is many decades old, but (for obvious reasons) enjoyed a resurrection during corona, being spread by people like Andrew Kaufman, Samantha Bailey and Thomas Cowan (plus their followers). So, this theory says that anytime someone sees what they think is a "virus", that what they see is actually generated by the cell itself in response to a "stress". What do those stresses consist of? I'll let the supporters themselves speak:
Along the way, Engelbrecht and Köhniein will analyze all possible causes of illness such as pharmaceuticals, lifestyle drugs, pesticides, heavy metals, pollution, stress and processed (and sometimes genetically modified) foods.
Of course all those things do contribute to disease, but the problem is that they do not explain most of what is attributed to viruses. Let's take shitty food, which is the basis for a lot of civilization's disease problems. It takes many years, or more likely decades, to incur a food-related disease problem such as diabetes or heart disease. And they develop slowly then - exactly the opposite of what viruses are alleged to do (sudden appearance and fast disappearance of symptoms). The same logic applies to heavy metals, pollution, stress and the drugs - which people usually deal with for years - so the severity of issues should follow the exposure time, as well. Stress and some drugs can cause sudden symptoms, but then you will know they came from there. Medical drug manuals always list them and well, everyone knows what stress does and it has only a few symptoms; it's insane to now blame everything on it. And the timing would be obvious in both of those cases. It is really bad reasoning to blame an issue that suddenly appeared on something a person has dealt with for years without bad effect.
The blaming of every symptom that shows up on something generic without consideration of the specific scenarios reminds me of the way vaccine lovers blame clear vaccine symptoms on whatever happens to appear in their minds first. Climate change (archive), gas prices (archive), video games (archive) ...everything to exonerate the vaccine. And the no virus theorists do the same to try and make viruses disappear. What do we do with symptoms that are clearly new? Such as the smell or taste loss from COVID - which do exist in chronic disease, too - but then again, they'd be developing slowly then, instead of instantly. And not all of the people that get them have been chronically sick. Some "no virus" supporters tried to blame it on 5G - which is at least an attempt, and the timing would fit. But not every country has 5G (archive), and yet they still suffer from COVID symptoms. What if someone has been healthy until then, and COVID still drops them for two days with symptoms they've never had? But again, the "no virus" theorists never bother coming up with actual explanations, just have a few buzzwords like "toxins" and "pollution" that they can blame everything on. And until this changes, the theory should be dismissed just as its supporters dismiss honesty and reasoning.
Of course, this doesn't mean that symptoms are never unjustly blamed on viruses, too (they clearly often are) - or that the medical industry does not sometimes avoid punishment for releasing poisons into the environment because they have managed to blame everything on a virus (archive). But dismissing the whole field of virology because of those few abuses isn't a good idea. So many things don't make sense without viruses like the thousands of studies that talk about the immune system, or herbs and nutrients killing viruses, or the ocean (archive) containing millions of them
in one drop of seawater (the air [archive] contains them, too), or the existence of outbreaks, etc. The "no virus" supporters never provide any adequate explanations for all these things. It seems to me that those people are not really interested in understanding, just contrarianism and poking holes (e.g about isolation procedures) in mainstream theories. Which is fine and can be valuable but it's not enough; at some point you need to start providing real answers for things that happen, e.g people getting sick in the same household at the same time. All provided explanations have been around since forever, so what it is that is suddenly different for the people losing their breaths, etc? Someone once messaged me trying to explain people getting sick with
media fearmongering, which is so funny in light of the fact that not everyone watches bullshit media. And have you heard of
media fearmongering causing those symptoms during any of the other times media has done so? E.g with climate change, "muslim terrorists" in France a decade ago or so, rising prices, now Putin, and whatever else. It's their bread and butter, yet we don't hear people going mass sick from it. I mean sure, fear can affect the disease response, but it doesn't do what the no virus people think it does - which is magically pull out a bunch of new symptoms out of a hat. Just got to find any way to make viruses disappear, I guess?
This theory also lets elites off the hook when they try to create deadly viruses against humanity in the virus labs (which it cannot even attempt to explain). Since the mainstream narrative for COVID was so seriously flawed from the beginning, the "no virus" theory came in like the superhero and provided a counter-narrative that pretty much required you to believe that nothing is real (like the flat Earth theory). This provided a way for the elites to throw every skeptic of mainstream theories into the "insane" box, keeping people locked inside the mainstream mental prisons forever. Does it not seem like the "no virus" theory was brought back from its grave so that the virus research (archive) continues on? Since if viruses don't exist, there's nothing harmful going on in those biolabs, surely. Another issue with this theory is that it prevents people from finding proper treatments for their ailments. After all, how is a sick person helped by someone telling them that what caused their sickness does not exist, but they can't tell them any replacement except banalities that don't actually explain anything? Leaving them to rot with their sickness, confused and with no treatment in sight.
Do you not see how none of the "pandemic" measures could have worked without an actual virus? You need at least some people having some (new) symptoms somewhere to justify "fighting COVID". How would you accomplish anything with a complete fake? People would eventually figure it out if they saw absolutely no one get sick. The "pandemic" was a triple punch of COVID creation, media embellishment, and finally the implementation of restrictions. In the end, I don't think the "no virus" theory is right and it distracts us from the truth that's behind door three - viruses exist, but they're being portrayed as monsters so that we're scared into submission and accept violating restrictions. When in reality there are simple treatments like nutritious diets and sun exposure that have been completely ignored by the mainstream. Indeed, there is actually no contradiction between germ theory and terrain theory; germs exist and can sometimes cause harmful effects, while the terrain is your body and can be improved by having adequate nutrition, exercise, good mentality, sometimes loading up on herbal medicine, etc. As I said before, anytime someone gets sick, there is an interplay between many factors - outside and inside the body (including the germs in this case). But this has all been forgotten and people being tribal divided themselves into camps, as usual - camps easy to pick off for the elites. Look at how the no virus people compiled a "naughty list" of dissenters against restrictions that still realize viruses exist. Oh yes, that's what's going to help us during the next lockdown or vaccine push.
First, let me state who do I mean by
the authorities. Most importantly, the so-called World Health Organization (archive) which has spread "guidance" over how to handle the fake pandemic (archive) and is the source of most of the recommendations
and restrictions which countries over the world have taken up. Also the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (archive), which is just an EU-specific WHO. Then come the governments themselves who chose to
implement those measures after all. Nutrition organizations that spread fake info to prevent people from healing themselves. The media that has scared everyone into submission could go in here
too. So do they have our best interests in mind? If it wasn't obvious already - fuck no. Let me remind you of when the WHO tried to erase natural immunity from existence:
Bet that fills you with confidence, doesn't it? They've also made this malicious claim that is very telling:
Not yet. To date, there is no vaccine and no specific antiviral medicines against COVID-19. However, people, particularly those with serious illness, may need to be hospitalized so that they can receive life-saving treatment for complications.. Most patients recover thanks to such care
Possible vaccines and some specific drug treatments are currently under investigation. They are being tested through clinical trials. WHO is coordinating efforts to develop vaccines and medicines to prevent and treat COVID-19.
The most effective ways to protect yourself and others against COVID-19 are to:
- Clean your hands frequently and thoroughly
- Avoid touching your eyes, mouth and nose
- Cover your cough with the bend of elbow or tissue. If a tissue is used, discard it immediately and wash your hands.
- Maintain a distance of at least 1 metre (3 feet) from others.
So they claim say is no cure for COVID-19. Surely, with 7000
experts working on there, they should know a thing or two about the immune system and how it kills microbes
all the time (update: some people have claimed that COVID-19 magically bypasses the immune system - here's a direct disproof (archive)). And, there are things we can do to support it (which actually have evidence for their effectiveness) that the WHO and other
pseudo-authorities completely fail to mention. On the other hand, they recommend measures that are at best unproven and at worst harmful:
nonessential businesseshas resulted in massive unemployment. In this study (archive), 59% of the participants lost their jobs due to the fake pandemic, which has contributed to their mental problems:
Nearly two-thirds of participants (64 percent) reported feeling down, depressed, or hopeless; three-quarters reported being anxious, nervous, or on edge; and just over two-thirds (67 percent) reported having little interest or pleasure in doing things.
For instance, Rapaport said that Masbia saw a 500 percent increase in demand over the past few months.
“We have done disasters before, but nothing is even close to what we are doing now,”
Rapaport fears that these efforts are still not enough to calm the rumbling stomachs of thousands of New Yorkers.
From the selected studies there was evidence that children and young people who are lonely might be as much as three times more likely to develop depression in the future, and that the impact of loneliness on mental health outcomes like depressive symptoms could last for years.
The number of deaths from any cause among the 1,951,905 children in Sweden (as of December 31, 2019) who were 1 to 16 years of age was 65 during the pre–Covid-19 period of November 2019 through February 2020 and 69 during 4 months of exposure to Covid-19 (March through June 2020)
No more deaths of children during COVID than earlier. But wait, there's more:
From March through June 2020, a total of 15 children with Covid-19 (including those with MIS-C) were admitted to an ICU [...] No child with Covid-19 died.
Almost two million schoolchildren, and
No child with Covid-19 died. But wait! They can still infect the teachers, so lock them up, right? Wrong:
Data from the Public Health Agency of Sweden (published report5 and personal communication) showed that fewer than 10 preschool teachers and 20 schoolteachers in Sweden received intensive care for Covid-19 up until June 30, 2020 (20 per 103,596 schoolteachers, which is equal to 19 per 100,000). As compared with other occupations (excluding health care workers), this corresponded to sex- and age-adjusted relative risks of 1.10 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 2.49) among preschool teachers and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.68) among schoolteachers
No more serious COVID cases in teachers than in any other occupations. This makes sense when you consider that asymptomatic people can't spread the infection, and kids just don't get sick from COVID (despite the media coming up with fake stories trying to prove otherwise).
Residents eat meals in their rooms, have activities and social gatherings cancelled, family visits curtailed or eliminated. Sometimes they are in isolation in their small rooms for days.
“She, almost overnight, went from a very active lifestyle to a very limited life, and they had, very early on, a complete two week confinement just to her room,” Tory said.
During those two weeks, since she couldn’t exercise by walking to the library or doing her own shopping, Russell would stand up and sit down, again and again in her room, counting the times, her daughter said.
“I do want to underscore the fact that she wanted medical assistance in dying at some point,” her daughter stressed. “And she had told her family doctor that, but the application was hastened by the impact of the lockdown measures.
On Oct. 20, Nancy Russell died with her loved ones by her side, honouring her wish for a death on her own terms.
The worst month was March, the one where lockdowns began. This can only be due to the COVID-19 response, because what else has changed that could explain such a big difference? And we know that e.g social isolation fucks with you psychologically, or even the feeling of fear and helplessness that the media keeps "installing" into people via TV propaganda.
Infection with SARS-CoV-2 occurred in 42 participants recommended masks (1.8%) and 53 control participants (2.1%).
The results of the pulmonary function tests are shown in Table 2. Both sm and ffpm significantly reduce the dynamic lung parameters. The average reduction of FVC was −8.8 ± 6.0% with sm and −12.6 ± 6.5% with ffpm. FEV1 was −7.6 ± 5.0% lower with sm and −13.0 ± 9.0% with ffpm compared to no mask. The peak flow measurement showed that both sm and ffpm significantly reduced the PEF (−9.7 ± 11.2% and −21.3 ± 12.4%, respectively).
FVC - forced vital capacity; FEV1 - forced expiratory volume in one second (these two parameters decrease if you have lung disease); SM - surgical mask; FFPM - N95 mask.
The measurements show that surgical masks, and to a greater extent FFP2/N95 masks, reduce the maximum power. P max (Watt) depends on energy consumption and the maximum oxygen uptake (VO 2max). The effect of the masks was most pronounced on VO 2max. Since the cardiac output was similar between the conditions, the reduction of P max was primarily driven by the observed reduction of the arterio-venous oxygen content (avDO2). Therefore, the primary effect of the face masks on physical performance in healthy individuals is driven by the reduction of pulmonary function.
Low peak expiratory flow is very harmful to people with any kind of breathing problems:
If your PEF drops below 80% of your personal best, follow your asthma action plan and check PEF more frequently that day or as directed by your doctor. Seek immediate help before your asthma symptoms worsen.
Some people who are forced to wear face masks all day in the workplace complain of headaches, shortness of breath and anxiety,” CBS DFW reported, detailing the experiences of employees of the Southern Sisters Salon in McKinney, Texas, who have been wearing masks for months.
This reddit thread (archive) contains more experiences of people's problems with masks, which include acne, runny nose, difficulty breathing, swelling, glasses fogging up and psychological / social issues.
Virus cultures were negative for all asymptomatic positive and repositive cases, indicating no ‘viable virus’ in positive cases detected in this study … The 300 asymptomatic positive persons aged from 10 to 89 years …
This means that, overall, just one in eight (13%) of those who wear washable, reusable face masks are actually maintaining them in a way that is helpful to stopping the spread of coronavirus.
Recall, also, that government mandates don't specify the kind of mask you're supposed to wear; and from my experience - most people are wearing useless ones they've made from an old pair of pants or something like that (and also not covering their nose).
Those challenges remain, but masks bring new barriers: in addition to blocking lip movements and facial expressions (which are so important when hearing is marginal), masks muffle the high frequency portions of sound that are essential to speech.
Lip reading makes up about half of my ability to understand what someone is saying. So once the face is covered it becomes really difficult to understand what is being said to me. I’m a big supporter of masks but I’m feeling pretty nervous about any unpredictable interactions I’m going to have now.
So much for caring about the disabled by the politicians and their SJW minions.
Emily Stevenson, a marine biologist widely known as the “Beach Guardian,” recently went to collect litter from a beach in Cornwall, along England’s southwestern coast, and found no less than 171 pieces of discarded PPE only in the span of one hour – a shocking rise from the six PPE items she had found on a previous beach cleanup.
“We’ve already found evidence of PPE actually sinking below the ocean surface,” Stevenson said, according to The Independent. “This means that there could be a totally unaccounted for concentration of PPE pollution on the seafloor, which can remain as dormant debris for centuries.” “Once on the seafloor, it smothers any biological structures such as important Sea Fan beds in the UK, or coral reefs further afield,” she continued. “Also, this debris entails a ‘plasticizing’ effect when on the seafloor – potentially inhibiting gas exchange between the water column and sediment.”
Have the countries with two-metre rules seen lower infection rates? It doesn’t look like it
For example Denmark, which has a one-metre social distancing policy, currently has death toll of over 600 in total.
Meanwhile the UK, which had a two-metre rule, currently has the third highest death rate in the world, behind the US and Brazil, with more than 40,000 deaths.
There is some evidence droplets can travel much farther than 2m, for example 6.5m or even 7-8m depending on various factors. These aren't very high quality studies, to be honest, but then again - we don't have that kind of evidence for most of the claims that the authorities make about corona. Breathing doesn't generate many droplets at all, so the only real risk is from coughing or sneezing; and it just so happens these overcome the recommended distance anyway, which makes the restrictions pointless.
Argentina is trying to solve a medical mystery after 57 sailors were infected with COVID-19 after 35 days at sea, despite the entire crew testing negative before leaving port.
However, all of the crew members had undergone 14 days of mandatory quarantine at a hotel in the city of Ushuaia. Prior to that, they had negative results, the ministry said in a statement.
So, 14 days of quarantine, and 35 days later, almost all the sailors randomly get sick with COVID-19. This means either that the virus can stick around in people for far longer than 14 days and reinfect them later, or that the infections here were artifacts of unreliable testing. Either way, doesn't this make quarantines seem completely stupid?
When we took samples from door handles, phones or toilets it has not been possible to cultivate the virus in the laboratory on the basis of these swabs….
The gels and sprays — which became a mainstay during the Covid outbreak — were found to contain dangerous levels of benzene, a carcinogen at the very top of the Government's most dangerous solvent list.
When rubbed onto the hands, even in relatively small doses, benzene can seep through the skin and into the blood stream where it can stop cells working correctly. It is known to cause leukemia and other blood disorders.
Overexposure to benzene can also cause bone marrow not to produce enough red blood cells, which can lead to anemia, as well as blood cancer.
It can also wreak havoc on the immune system by altering blood levels of antibodies and killing off white blood cells.
Last year an independent lab found nearly one in five hand sanitizers may contain benzene. Valisure tested 260 bottles of hand sanitizer from 168 brands for the carcinogen that were bought in pharmacies across the US.
Various cancers, anemia, and destruction of the immune system. Great! The funny thing is, the whole issue apparently exists only because the government lifted the limits for the toxic benzene in hand sanitizer products:
The agency also brought in a temporary legal limit of up to two ppm of benzene permitted in the products to help speed up production - amid fears over a national shortage.
One neighbour of mine died as a COVID-19 collateral damage. He was on dialysis waiting for a kidney transplant and he didn't get it in time due to everything getting delayed because of the fuking 'flu'. He was 34.
FACT: Vitamin and mineral supplements cannot cure COVID-19
Micronutrients, such as vitamins D and C and zinc, are critical for a well-functioning immune system and play a vital role in promoting health and nutritional well-being. There is currently no guidance on the use of micronutrient supplements as a treatment of COVID-19.
This alleged "fact" is conclusively refuted in a future section, and the WHO is exposed as the enemy of your health!
So, late October, Emily Oster - a journalist for The Atlantic - wrote an article (archive) calling for an "amnesty" for the COVID criminals that have been destroying the world for almost 3 years now. It uses the standard
we just didn't know argument to forgive and forget the criminals:
Our cloth masks made out of old bandanas wouldn’t have done anything, anyway. But the thing is: We didn’t know.
But most errors were made by people who were working in earnest for the good of society.
And surely, we did not know some things - but we did know a lot. And that "a lot" exposes the malicious intent behind the COVID response. Let's give some examples:
But of course, Emily considers none of this, but only the few small points where the
we just didn't know argument appears to fit. I am not sure if she is a malicious actor, since she did speak out against some of the restrictions. But that's all for nothing if you don't have the full picture. She still shills for the vaccines, thinking it matters which type of poison you get:
When the vaccines came out, we lacked definitive data on the relative efficacies of the Johnson & Johnson shot versus the mRNA options from Pfizer and Moderna. The mRNA vaccines have won out. But at the time, many people in public health were either neutral or expressed a J&J preference. This misstep wasn’t nefarious. It was the result of uncertainty.
Why not mention the fact that the Pfizer trial was a total sham on purpose? Again, the COVID vaccines can only seem like a good idea to someone that hasn't read a lot. Any other drug would have been taken off the market long ago with so much damage done. That the vaccines still remain, shows malice on part of the elites.
Frankly, this article makes me really angry, because it is a totally indefensible attempt to save the elites from consequences. We need to expect some quality from our decision makers, just like we expect it from the bridge builders. If a bridge builder kept creating ones that fell apart when a few people walked on them, they'd be out of job instantly. But the people currently at the top did not suffer the slightest inconvenience - or even got rewarded. Such as the executives of the vaccine companies, or the politicians who installed restrictions, or even the hospitals who got paid for putting patients on the harmful ventilators. If a person can just do whatever they want once they get a high position, we are totally fucked! And the COVID situation is the perfect opportunity to fix that, but no one cares. Exactly because articles like Emily's muddy the waters. It seems that some people just cannot accept that the rulers of this world could be so extremely evil, so they make up nonsensical stuff about their lack of knowledge. But just because most prefer their comfortable life of walking in the dark, doesn't mean we have to give up doing what's right. Force the ruling elites to admit everything shown in this report live on TV, then send them to work in a coal mine - and replace them with people who are actually not psychopaths.
But to be honest, this problem has been going on for a long time now. Our society is designed around hierarchy, where the higher up can do whatever they want to and the people under them have to take it - with no ability to affect it, usually. That's the primary thing that has to change for anything to get better, IMO. Without pressure from your underlings, why even think about the effects of your decisions? Why even care? You do your tasks, and you go home with money that will put food on the table. This applies everywhere, and gets off the hook nurses that inject the COVID poisons, police that abuses a homeless person, and really anyone that hurts someone in whatever way. There is a fundamental problem here that most people don't appear to be seeing. What I'm getting at is: plebs have to stand up sometime if they see a higher-up doing something harmful.
Many dissidents (or would-be ones) died (usually in suspicious circumstances) during the course of the "pandemic" or right before it. Let us explore their untimely demises:
Kary Mullis - as mentioned before - invented the PCR test (archive). He was also clear on the fact that it cannot be used to diagnose disease (archive) - and it was used exactly for that during the "pandemic". He had a history of criticizing various mainstream narratives - such as the ones about climate change or HIV / AIDS (archive) - and surely would not have let slide the COVID one, especially when the misuse of his invention was at the center of it. Unfortunately, he won't get to say anything as he died from pneumonia (archive) in August 2019, right before the "pandemic" started. The fearmongers could not have pushed the "pandemic" through if Kary was alive when it began. Therefore he had to be eliminated, and pneumonia can be induced by drugs.
The president of Haiti, who refused the donation (archive) of 756 000 vials of AstraZeneca's COVID non-vaccine in April 2021, and was killed 3 months later (archive):
“An unidentified group of individuals, some of whom were speaking in Spanish, attacked the private residence of the President of the Republic and mortally wounded him,”
A week after the killing, his country received (archive) a "gift" of 500 000 vials of the poison. This situation is unique in that we have clear proof that he was actually murdered. Totally unrelated to his rejection of the vaccines though, I'm sure.
Tanzania's president, who has exposed PCR tests (archive) as unreliable:
The president said he had instructed Tanzanian security forces to check the quality of the kits. They had randomly obtained several non-human samples, including from a pawpaw, a goat and a sheep, but had assigned them human names and ages.
Samples from the pawpaw and the goat tested positive for COVID-19, the president said, adding this meant it was likely that some people were being tested positive when in fact they were not infected by the coronavirus.
He did not like (archive) lockdowns or vaccines:
Magufuli in a speech Wednesday scorned the idea of a lockdown to prevent the coronavirus from spreading and poured doubt on the effectiveness of vaccines.
He went missing (archive) on February 27, 2021:
Magufuli, a 61-year-old leader nicknamed "The Bulldozer," was last seen in public on Feb. 27 looking his normal self as he swore in a new chief secretary at State House in Tanzania's commercial capital Dar es Salaam.
He, then, died (archive) on March 17:
“Dear Tanzanians, it is sad to announce that today 17 March 2021 around 6 p.m. we lost our brave leader, President John Magufuli who died from heart disease at Mzena hospital in Dar es Salaam where he was getting treatment," the vice president said on state broadcaster TBC.
This was just a little over a month after The Guardian called (archive) to
rein in the president. But remember that he has gone
missing (likely captured) much earlier - less than 3 weeks after the unfortunate article.
The new president predictably did a 180 (archive) in terms of the COVID response:
On April 6, President Samia announced the formation of the committee with a strong emphasis on fighting the pandemic through scientific methods.
President Samia has always stressing on the need to wear face masks in all public gatherings.
She - of course - took up the vaccines, as well:
After she received a report from the Committee among the major changes announced include granting permission to embassies and international institutions in Tanzania to import Covid-19 vaccines for their people and employees.
Burundi's president died (archive) from a heart attack on June 8, 2020:
Mr. Nkurunziza, 55, had shown no sign of illness until he was admitted to hospital in the town of Karuzi on Saturday. After appearing to recover on Sunday, his health worsened “to very great surprise” on Monday and he could not be revived, despite several hours of effort, a government statement said.
Recovering, then suddenly getting worse and dying. Nothing suspicious here /s. He didn't care to have any kind of COVID restrictions:
Burundi was one of the few countries worldwide that refused to ban sports events or take other restrictive measures. It also allowed mass campaign rallies of tens of thousands of people during the election campaign last month. Face masks were rarely seen.
And kicked out "experts" from the WHO:
Four experts from the World Health Organization, who had reportedly questioned the government’s response to the pandemic, were expelled from Burundi last month.
Not even a month later, the new president did a 180 (archive) about COVID (of course):
While swearing in his new cabinet on 30 June, President Ndayishimiye declared the pandemic would be “the biggest enemy of Burundians.”
Funnily enough, Burundi still has only 38 COVID deaths (archive) (December 2022). Truly the biggest enemy, this COVID. Despite the extremely low COVID death rate in Burundi, Western media jumped (archive) to claim that Nkurunziza was one of the few people to have died from COVID (it would mean he was literally the first COVID death there - how likely is that?!).
6 people (including 3 foreigners) tried to kill (archive) Madagascar's president on July 23, 2021 - but failed. In April 2020, he launched (archive) a herbal remedy for COVID - which the WHO has shat on (archive):
In response to the launch of Covid-Organics, the WHO said, in a statement sent to the BBC, that the global organisation did not recommend "self-medication with any medicines... as a prevention or cure for Covid-19".
As you can see, the WHO hates the idea of being your own doctor - you just got to take the jab and stay home. This could provide context for why Andry was targeted later. And hey, guess which (archive) remedy turned out better?
Several extracts as well as Covid-Organics inhibited SARS-CoV-2 and FCoV infection at concentrations that did not affect cell viability.
Another study (archive):
Hot-water leaf extracts based on artemisinin, total flavonoids, or dry leaf mass showed antiviral activity with IC50 values of 0.1-8.7 μM, 0.01-0.14 μg, and 23.4-57.4 μg, respectively.
Even if you assumed Covid-Organics does nothing (which is contradicted by the above studies), it is still better than the WHO's measures which are actually negative - while the herbal remedy isn't going to hurt you. Maybe that's why Rajoelina had an assassination attempt - he dared to stick out his head, and try to do something on his own, instead of bowing down to his NWO masters.
And so, we have 3 cases (plus one almost-case) of presidents who heavily disagreed with the WHO / NWO prescription for the "pandemic" and died during it. Those who died were promptly replaced by pro-WHO / NWO ones. Why did none of this happen to all the cucked European / Asian / USA presidents that went full speed into the restrictions? That's the question that has to be answered by anyone who wants to "fact check" this pattern into a coincidence. The probabilities here are insane when you consider the amount of countries and the fact that only the people who went against restrictions were hurt. Then check the particulars, like one of the presidents dying after being sure to recover (hospitals are a favorite assassination place for the psychopaths running this world, and two out of four attempts happened in those). Erasing Mullis additionally gave the elites the head-start needed for preparing the "pandemic". That all of this just somehow happened, is impossible for me, taking everything into account.
Early on in the "pandemic", there were 115 vaccine candidates (archive). Our favorite Billy Gates somehow knew that the newly developed mRNA vaccines will take the center stage:
That’s why I’m particularly excited by two new approaches that some of the candidates are taking: RNA and DNA vaccines.
What makes those different is that - instead of a weakened virus - they give your body direct genetic instructions to execute:
Here’s how an RNA vaccine works: rather than injecting a pathogen’s antigen into your body, you instead give the body the genetic code needed to produce that antigen itself.
This is the first time such a technology has been used to vaccinate humans:
Since COVID would be the first RNA vaccine out of the gate
What were the results? Is it
safe and effective like we've been told? Let's check it out:
So I was reading the Pfizer clinical trial to learn about the effectiveness of their vaccine. They've divided 36523 people into two roughly equally sized groups - one gets the vaccine, the other not. In the no-vaccine group, 162 people ended up getting COVID, while in vaccine group only 8. They portrayed it as a 95% effectiveness, but the way they've calculated it is 162 / 8 (results 20) then 100 / 20 (results 5). So the vaccine group had 5% of the amount of sick people as the no vaccine group. But these results are kind of meaningless without considering the actual amount people that got sick. In the no vaccine group, 0.88% of the test participants got COVID, compared to 0.04% in the vaccine group. The difference isn't so impressive now, is it? You have only less than 1% of a chance to contract COVID regardless of whether you took the vaccine or not. But how did they actually determine if you have COVID, anyway?
So all you needed to be considered "infected" was one symptom (even something like muscle pain, which could be from anything including the vaccine or the water injection) plus a positive
nucleic acid amplification-based test (sounds like PCR, without mentioning the cycles used that would determine its accuracy). Doesn't seem very reliable, I'd make it at least three symptoms plus a PCR test with a relevant amount of cycles that is actually stated instead of hidden. I suspect the amount of actual COVID-19 cases is much less than displayed, because of the lax criteria. And since most of them are in the no-vaccine group, the biggest decrease would be there, and the vaccine's reported effectiveness would go down a lot.
UPDATE November 2022: turns out the situation is worse than I thought. The trial was a total sham (archive), not even being able to test all the participants for COVID:
In several cases Ventavia lacked enough employees to swab all trial participants who reported covid-like symptoms, to test for infection.
How hard would it be to just "accidentally" not test the vaccinated so that the effectiveness of the vaccine artificially goes up? The patients were also unblinded:
Another showed vaccine packaging materials with trial participants’ identification numbers written on them left out in the open, potentially unblinding participants.
This means some of them could have known they are taking the vaccine, and then the placebo effect could have worked, again bringing the vaccine effectiveness artificially up. Data could have also been directly falsified:
a Ventavia executive identified three site staff members with whom to “Go over e-diary issue/falsifying data, etc.” One of them was “verbally counseled for changing data and not noting late entry,”
One of the whistleblowers says said that she has never seen such a trashfire clinical trial as the Pfizer one:
“I’ve never had to do what they were asking me to do, ever,” she told The BMJ. “It just seemed like something a little different from normal—the things that were allowed and expected.”
So, it's likely that the Pfizer vaccine effectiveness is a total mirage, and it really doesn't do anything except cause a bunch of side effects.
For example, Senegal - where only 6% of people took a COVID vaccine - had a COVID death rate of 12.1 people per 100000 (or 0.0121%). Nigeria with 10% jab rate had an even lesser death rate - just 0.0016%. Cameroon - 4% vaccination rate, 0.0075% COVID deaths. Algeria - 15% / 0.016%. Syria - 10% / 0.0185%. Chad - 12% / 0.0012%. You can pretty much pick any of the really low vaccinated countries and find a low COVID death rate, too. On the other hand, the country with the highest COVID death rate (Peru at 0.657%) had a 83% vaccination rate. Why did the jabs not save its inhabitants? Why are really highly vaccinated European countries (such as Italy or Spain) rotting with COVID death rates of 0.2796% and 0.2296% (over 10 times higher than the low vaccinated ones)? Hungary - the fourth highest country in terms of COVID deaths - had 64% of its inhabitants take the shot; and yet that didn't save them. Looking further down, Serbia or Ukraine have twice less deaths with much lower jab rates. At the very least, this data shows that even avoiding the vaccine almost completely does not doom a country - and taking a lot of shots does not protect it, either. But there might actually be a correlation between higher vaccination rates and higher COVID deaths.
Natural immunity is almost 7 times stronger (archive) than vaccine-induced immunity - so if you've already had COVID, it seems pointless to take the vaccine. It has also been proven (archive) that the vaccinated are more likely to spread the so-called Delta COVID variant than the unvaccinated:
We observed low Ct values (<25) in 212 of 310 fully vaccinated (68%; Figure 1A) and 246 of 389 (63%) unvaccinated individuals. Testing a subset of low-Ct samples revealed infectious SARS-CoV-2 in 15 of 17 specimens (88%) from unvaccinated individuals and 37 of 39 (95%) from vaccinated people
The Delta variant is the most common one in the UK (archive) and the US (archive). And if the vaccine doesn't even work for preventing infection or transmission (by that variant), then the only reason to take it is for decreasing the severity of symptoms. UPDATE: the Pfizer CEO has also admitted (archive) that two doses of his vaccine (what has until recently been considered "fully vaccinated") do not work against Omicron. In that case, the unvaccinated are in the exact same position as the vaccinated, except without the risk of side effects from the vaccine.
UPDATE January 2023: hey, we have yet another study showing natural immunity is stronger:
During follow-up, 7123 SARS-CoV-2 infections were recorded in the BNT162b2-vaccinated cohort and 3583 reinfections were recorded in the matched natural infection cohort. 4282 SARS-CoV-2 infections were recorded in the mRNA-1273-vaccinated cohort and 2301 reinfections were recorded in the matched natural infection cohort.
Two times less infections in the natural immunity group than the vaccine group. And not even less hospitalization to save the jab receivers:
The overall adjusted HR for severe (acute care hospitalisations), critical (intensive care unit hospitalisations), or fatal COVID-19 cases was 0·24 (0·08–0·72) after previous natural infection versus BNT162b2 vaccination, and 0·24 (0·05–1·19) after previous natural infection versus mRNA-1273 vaccination.
Annoyingly, the authors just had to include the standard pro-vax disclaimer:
Vaccination remains the safest and most optimal tool for protecting against infection and COVID-19-related hospitalisation and death, irrespective of previous infection status.
Ha-ha. Do the journals really not them publish without it? Sad state of science. Anyway - if the vaccine is not
effective - let's see if it's
Before the "pandemic" we've got about 50K reports of vaccine side effects per year - of all the vaccines used that year in the US. During the 2018-19 flu season, 49% (archive) of the US population decided to take the vaccine. This is about 165M million, very similar to the 177M of people fully vaccinated for COVID.Now check this out:
The COVID vaccines are over ten times more likely to cause side effects than all the other vaccines from previous years put together. More than 90% of COVID vaccines used in the US are Pfizer and Moderna - both using the newly developed mRNA technology - so the increased side effects can be blamed on them. For the 2018-19 season (before corona) I'm taking into account flu vaccine doses ONLY - because I wasn't able to find the data for any others. If I did, it would increase the taken doses, decrease the percentage of side effects (since the amount of VAERS reports is already determined), and tip the scale against the COVID vaccines even more. Fact checkers - such as here (archive) and here (archive) - try to deny the results of VAERS by saying that anyone can submit a report and that they
just show signals, etc. This criticism is completely worthless in light of the fact that the amount of side effects is ten times higher since the introduction of COVID vaccines. Unless these so-called fact checkers prove that the stats somehow became ten times less reliable in one year - and they haven't done that because they can't. UPDATE July 2022: there is another way to show that the additional side effects are really from the vaccines instead of "fraudulent reports" or some other "fact checker" imagination. Look:
The higher the amount of vaccines given in an USA state, the more injury reports. The states with the least vaccinated people have almost no reports. An almost perfect correlation. The real harm done by the COVID vaccines is much higher than it seems from the VAERS data, though. Studies have estimated that VAERS underreports side effects by anywhere from 90% (archive) to 99% or more (archive). With 90% underestimation, the almost 600K people harmed by the vaccines jumps to 5 400 000 (out of 177 million fully vaccinated against COVID). With 99% underestimation that would be almost 60 million - and the true figure is probably somewhere in the middle.
The CDC (for the purposes of corona) also invented a new side effect tracking system called V-Safe, that's probably more reliable - you don't have to fill out a whole huge report (like for VAERS), just periodically get asked a few questions through your smartphone. Let's see what are its results:
Astonishing. One out of four people injected with these concoctions (both doses, as recommended by "the experts") will experience joint pain during 7 days after taking the vaccine. Almost half of the
lab rats patients will have a headache, more than half fatigue. And 30% fever, what corona allegedly causes is also done by the vaccine. Only problem with V-Safe is how a normal person can't traverse the database in order to find associations. All we can do is rely on scientists that have written papers based on the data, and there aren't a lot of them. But this single one (archive) is revealing enough.
The amount of US people fully vaccinated for COVID is 177 million. VAERS reports 91696 cases of fatigue among the COVID vaccinated - that's 0.05%. The percentage of patients with fatigue reported by V-Safe is 54. To reach that kind of percentage with VAERS, you'd have to assume an underestimation rate of more than 1000 times. Meaning that less than 0.1% of side effects get reported through VAERS. The same kind of calculation for headache gives 0.07% reported by VAERS and 46.7 by V-Safe, an underestimation by 667 times. So let's assume, to be generous to the vaccinators, that the underestimation is only 500 times - 0.2% of events being reported. Applying that to death, VAERS reports 7414 such cases related to the COVID vaccines. Multiplying by 500 gives us 3 million 707 thousand people killed by the vaccine in the US. If we instead consider the more conservative estimate of 90% underestimation (the first study), then the amount of deaths is "only" 74140. But if we take V-Safe's results at face value, and assume that the same underestimation rate applies to all side effects (this might not be true - after all, you'd think deaths would be more easily detected and reported) - then we end up with a COVID vaccine murder count of 4 million people.
UPDATE November 2022: hey, no wonder they've decided to use scientists to gatekeep the actual V-safe data. Because this recently dropped (archive):
Among numerous alarming results, out of the approximate 10 million individuals that registered and submitted data to v-safe, 782,913 individuals, or over 7.7% of v-safe users, had a health event requiring medical attention, emergency room intervention, and/or hospitalization.
Over 25% or 250,000, had an event that required them to miss school or work and/or prevented normal activities.
Unfortunately (for the vaccinators) the legal system has worked in our favor for once and the data is out of the bag. Too bad the website is Cloudflared and I can't actually check it out, but oh well. Either way, the
Safe and Effective narrative has absorbed yet another blow; the referee has sounded the bell, the fight is over: the vaccine has been declared a poison.
Just in case you thought they are only mild, and won't affect you anyway:
His initial laboratory results showed serum glucose level of 1253 mg/dL(normal is about 100, 300+ requires medical intervention)
and 90 days after the first inoculation, serum creatinine levels were significantly higher than those before vaccination, resulting in reduced eGFR. Let's consider the fact that the study lasted for only 90 days, so the damage likely persists much longer. And after this much time you'd already be going for your booster, redoing the damage - making your disease effectively permanent.
Laboratory results reflected severe myocardial damage,
and his heart rate was 30 beats per minute with third AVB(these are two different cases). 40-70% death rate. Enjoy.
The patient was found to be profoundly hypoxic with an arterial partial pressure of oxygen of 80 mmHg on 100% oxygen, tidal volume of 420 mL, respiratory rate of 30 breaths per minute, and positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 10 cm water,
but he could not be weaned off the ventilator, leading to tracheostomy and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy placement. So, dude ended up with a pipe in his neck and yet they called it a
favorable recovery. What a joke.
We report a 78-year old woman who was presented with tetraparesis, paresthesias of bilateral upper extremities, and urinary retention of one-day duration,
Spine magnetic resonance imaging showed longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (TM) from the C1 to the T3 spinal cord segment.
On arrival, she began to vomit blood, fell into a coma and her heart stopped. The symptoms took twenty minutes to appear, and the next day the young woman wasn't with us anymore. RIP.
he tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 before he died. Second, the vaccine does not prevent serious COVID symptoms -
Our patient now presented with fever and respiratory discomfort, and lung auscultation displayed crackles. Third, the vaccine caused additional symptoms that don't get caused by COVID itself. Fourth, the symptoms came in before he had a positive COVID test, so we know they came from the vaccine and not from COVID. He already had kidney failure at day 18 and only got infected by COVID at day 25. Oh and finally, one dose is enough to cause those issues. RIP. Another victim of the failed medical experiment.
Review of the liver biopsy showed acute active hepatitis: widespread areas of bridging necrosis, marked interface hepatitis, lymphoplasmatic inflammation including eosinophils, ballooned hepatocytes, multi-nucleated giant cells, and emperipolesis.
This occurred in a well man with no other medical problems. The onset of jaundice associated with the mRNA vaccine was unusually rapid.
First of all, consider the fact that Pfizer has excluded pregnant women from their vaccine study:
Now why would they do that other than a suspicion that the vaccine is in fact harmful to pregnant women? Yet that didn't stop the "fact checkers" (archive) and the governments from claiming that the vaccine is safe for pregnant women, despite having no specific tests. Another reason to suspect the vaccine attacks the reproductive system is the fact the ovaries are a major mRNA accumulation point (in rats, since it wasn't tested in humans):
When the US government (archive) attempted to prove that the vaccines are safe for pregnant women, they had to resort to fraud (archive). Look:
V-safe pregnancy registry participants who received at least one dose of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine preconception or prior to 20 weeks’ gestation and who did not report a pregnancy loss before 6 completed weeks’ gestation were included in this analysis to assess the cumulative risk of SAB using Life Table methods.
What this means is they've arbitrarily excluded the women who've had their miscarriages happen before week 6. Which just so happens to be the week when miscarriages stop happening (archive):
Implantation usually occurs around 3 weeks after a person’s last period and about a week after ovulation. By week 4, they may be able to get a positive result on a home pregnancy test.
As many as 50–75% of pregnancies end before getting a positive result on a pregnancy test. Most people will never know that they were pregnant, though some may suspect that they were because of pregnancy loss symptoms.
The rate of miscarriage at this point varies significantly. One 2013 study found that the overall chance of losing a pregnancy after week 5 is 21.3%.
The same study suggested that after week 6, the rate of loss drops to 5%. In most cases, it is possible to detect a heartbeat on an ultrasound around week 6.
The rate of miscarriages is 50-75% in week 3 and 4, 21% in week 5, 5% in week 6 and even less later. And the study only considered women who miscarried week 6 or later. So, the "researchers" eliminated the women who could actually get miscarriages, which then allowed them to claim that the vaccine does not cause them. It would be like, if I wanted to prove that people can't jump, I would only include the obese in my study, who actually can't jump. The honest way to do the study would be to include all the weeks - but they couldn't have done that because it would show that the vaccine DOES in fact induce miscarriages. An admitted fraud, right in the methods.
Oh, by the way, we now have proof that the vaccine attacks the male reproductive system, too.
Repetitive measurements revealed −15.4% sperm concentration decrease on T2 (CI -25.5%–3.9%, p = 0.01) leading to total motile count 22.1% reduction (CI -35% - -6.6%, p = 0.007) compared to T0.. The people reporting the results have of course begun with the standard lip service for the vaccine:
The development of covid-19 vaccinations represents a notable scientific achievement. Hahaha. By the way, I've read the paper itself and (as usual) the abstract as well as the media reporting are fraudulent. The situation is much worse than it seems - look:
T3 are the results 150+ days after taking the shot, and they still show a
Total Motile Count drop of 19.4%, and
Sperm concentration drop of 15.9% compared to the baseline (before vaccination). Comparing T2 to T3 shows that the sperm concentration still keeps falling at month 6 after the shot - while the abstract claims that
T3 evaluation demonstrated overall recovery. of sperm functionality. Science is in on the fraud, my friends. The vast majority of people will only read the abstract, and trust the assurances of fact checkers (archive) - which repeat the same
recovery lie - so the fraud works very well. Let me reiterate, the month 6 sperm functionality is lower than the month 3 one. This likely means that the damage is forever. After all, wouldn't the functionality have come back after five months if it was supposed to? A bone break heals long before that, for example. But the data shows the sperm parameters are still getting worse at that point.
Let's check out some definitions. From the encyclopedia Britannica (archive):
Vaccine, suspension of weakened, killed, or fragmented microorganisms or toxins or of antibodies or lymphocytes that is administered primarily to prevent disease.
Now from some medical organizations (archive):
Vaccines are products that protect people against many diseases that can be very dangerous and even deadly. Different than most medicines that treat or cure diseases, vaccines prevent you from getting sick with the disease in the first place.
And another (archive):
Vaccines are the most effective way to prevent infectious diseases.
And another (archive):
A vaccine is a type of medicine that trains the body’s immune system so that it can fight a disease it has not come into contact with before. Vaccines are designed to prevent disease, rather than treat a disease once you have caught it.
And from a reputable dictionary (archive):
a preparation introduced into the body to prevent a disease by causing the body to produce antibodies against it, usually a weakened substance containing the virus causing the disease against which the body can react.
Okay, that's enough. We can see from all of them that prevention is the name of the game. But does the COVID vaccine prevent getting COVID? No (archive):
The COVID-19 vaccine does not prevent COVID-19. A person who is fully vaccinated can still contract the SARS-CoV-2 virus, which causes COVID-19, and may go on to develop the disease.
And another confirmation (archive):
People who are fully vaccinated can get breakthrough infections and spread the virus to others.
Now let's compare to other vaccines, such as the tetanus one (archive):
Tetanus vaccines can completely prevent tetanus
And rabies (archive):
Rabies is a 100% vaccine-preventable disease
Okay, that's enough. According to mainstream sources, a vaccine is defined by being able to prevent the disease it is given for. And - again - according to mainstream sources, the COVID vaccine does not do that while all the others do. So it clearly shouldn't be called a vaccine. What should we call it? How about an arbitrary code execution exploit, but for humans? Since that's what the mRNA vaccines literally are. Funnily enough, they started changing the definition of the word "vaccine" on some sites to protect the COVID genetic therapies. Let's look at the pre-COVID Cambridge Dictionary definition:
a substance containing a virus or bacterium in a form that is not harmful, given to a person or animal to prevent them from getting the disease that the virus or bacterium causes:
And the new one (archive):
a substance that is put into the body of a person or animal to protect them from a disease by causing them to produce antibodies (=proteins that fight diseases):
Prevention emphasized in the old one and changed to
protection in the new one. We were always at war with Eurasia.
There we go, a conclusive proof that the vaccine does not protect against dying from COVID. The double-vaxed die at a very similar rate to the unvaxed (please take the respective population sizes into account while comparing), and the boosted fare even worse. Hey, since they gave up on the vaccine preventing infection and transmission, wasn't it supposed to at least make us not go to the hospital and obviously not die? But it doesn't even do that and taking multiple boosters actually makes you more than 3 times susceptible to a COVID death than a single booster, and six times more than being unvaccinated. Thanks to redditor iResistDe4iAm (archive) for compiling the data.
Summarizing: there are 3 main reasons to avoid the vaccine. One, it's a new technology (mRNA) that is clearly much more harmful than the way vaccines were made before - but whose long term side effects are also totally unknown. Two, you're taking a vaccine for something that's unlikely to significantly affect you, anyway. If you ride it out (as in, get infected without dying), you get an immunity that's stronger than what the vaccine would have provided. Three, and perhaps the most important - you're denying the elites the world they really want. The world where you have to take their preferred substances to participate in society. Lockdowns and quarantines are apart of the same slavery scheme - but the vaccines are worse. Since they edit your genetics, they're giving away the control of your body permanently to the elites (perhaps why Billy was able to "predict" they're going to take the center stage? No, that can't be...). The vaccine passports can also be kept going indefinitely (it will be just another document required for flights, hospital visits, etc - same as an ID card or whatever), unlike lockdowns and quarantines. What about the other types of vaccines, such as the Chinese or Indian ones? Though they're less dangerous than the mRNAs, reasons 2 and 3 still apply.
What is the proper course of action against infections, then? How about supporting your immune system - which is what has to deal with any kind of virus or bacteria, anyway? Here are some relevant quotes from the excellent book The Wheel of Health:
These areas of infection due to the same cause were very varied in character and situation. One rat would have something wrong with its ear, another with its stomach, another with its bladder, and so on.
Actually, 44 percent of the 92 rats had something wrong with their urinary organs; 24 percent with their ears and noses; 38 percent with their eyes; 21 percent with their stomachs and intestines; and 9 percent with their lungs.
If a source of Vitamin A, such as butter, cod liver oil or egg yolk formed a part of the diet, infective lesions were never seen in rats, the addition of these substances to the deficient diets, generally resulted in rapid improvement and ultimate cure
So, rats fed shitty diets get infections - but the ones given a good diet don't and can in fact rapidly cure themselves - proving the WHO completely wrong. Of course, these infections were unspecified, but there's no reason to think COVID-19 would somehow be exempt. The great thing about the immune system is that it's universal and can kill every single bacteria and virus in existence - including the mighty COVID-19 (archive) or even salmonella (archive). If this wasn't the case - and we required a specific drug or a vaccine for every new pathogen that might appear (and this happens all the time (archive)) - anyone who didn't get those medical remedies would just die. We have survived on this Earth for millions of years, and for a lot of that time, there was no handwash, antibiotics, masks or stuff like that. Yet we're still here today, because our immune system is very effective at its job. However, civilization is full of toxic assaults that can weaken it - such as refined sugar (archive), industrial seed oils (archive), pesticides (archive), EMFs (archive) and psychological stress (archive). So how can we protect ourselves?
Children with low levels were more likely to have fever at a temperature of 40 degrees C or higher (68% vs 44%), to have fever for 7 days or more (54% vs 23%), and to be hospitalized (55% vs 30%). Children with low vitamin A levels had lower measles-specific antibody levels.
Overall, the mean plasma retinol concentration was 1.74 ± 1.09 µmol/L in TB patients and 2.8 ± 0.97 µmol/L in healthy controls (Table 2). Comparison between TB patients and healthy controls showed a statistically significant difference (p < 0.0001).
The recognition that RA induces gut imprinting, together with our finding that it enhances A-Treg conversion (A-Treg = T regulatory cells - addition mine), differentiation, and expansion, indicates that RA production in vivo may drive both the imprinting and A-Treg development in the face of overt inflammation.
The US Recommended Daily Allowance of vitamin A is currently 5,000 IU per day (and may possibly be lowered to 2500 IU per day). From the work of Weston Price, we can assume that the amount in indigenous diets was about 50,000 IU per day
When immune cells called macrophages encounter a pathogen and become activated, the vitamin D pathway is turned on, leading to the induction of the cathelicidin antimicrobial peptide if serum levels of vitamin D are sufficient
subjects treated with vitamin D supplementation had immune-related differential gene expression in alveolar macrophages.
Each 10 nmol/l increase in 25(OH)D was associated with a 7 % lower risk of infection (95 % CI 3, 11 %) after adjustment for adiposity, lifestyle and socio-economic factors.
In those patients who do have influenza, we have treated them with the vitamin D hammer, as coined by my colleague. This is a 1-time 50 000 IU dose of vitamin D3 or 10 000 IU 3 times daily for 2 to 3 days. The results are dramatic, with complete resolution of symptoms in 48 to 72 hours.
Now, I've mentioned before that the immune system is universal - so it doesn't matter what kind of pathogen you've got, it will still mount a defense. This, though, will not satisfy the fearmongers or their unfortunate victims who've been brainwashed into thinking nCov is magic fairy dust. Here - then - is evidence that Vitamin D is directly involved in fighting against COVID-19:
Mean serum 25(OH) vitamin D level was significantly lower among deceased patients compared with the surviving patients (10.4 ± 6.4 vs. 19.3 ± 11.2 ng/mL, respectively)
Mean serum 25(OH) vitamin D level was significantly lower in patients with severe-critical COVID-19 compared to that of patients with moderate COVID-19 (10.1 ± 6.2 vs. 26.3 ± 8.4 ng/mL, respectively)
A total of 237 hospitalized patients with COVID-19 aged 22-99 years (mean: 63.3 ± 15.7 years) were enrolled in the study. Almost all patients were vitamin D deficient (97%), 55% were severely vitamin D deficient (<25 nmol/L) and 42% were vitamin D deficient (<50 nmol/L); 3% had insufficient vitamin D levels (<75 nmol/L), and none had optimal vitamin D levels.
The actually optimal level of Vitamin D is 135 nmol / L (54 - the maximum amount that prevents a disease - multiplied by 2.5 for the conversion factor of ng / ml):
insufficient patients in this study were really deficient all along (for example, the
insufficient level is not even enough to prevent type 1 diabetes), while the
severely deficient ones were already at death's door. So when a study says something like:
With the use of such definitions, it has been estimated that 1 billion people worldwide have vitamin D deficiency or insufficiency.
They are using those inadequate values instead of what the disease charts show. Therefore the real amount of Vitamin D deficient people is a lot higher than it seems. The proper levels of Vitamin D are also corroborated by indigenous people having an average level of 46 ng / ml (115 nmol / L) (archive). And yet, guess what level do the so-called health authorities recommend? (archive):
Vitamin D has major role in calcium and bone metabolism. Normal values are 75-100 nmol/L (30-40 ng/ml). Vitamin D deficiency is defined if serum hydroxyvitamin D levels are less than 50 nmol/L (20 ng/ml), insufficiency as 50-75 nmol/L (20-30 ng/ml).
If you have even mild Vitamin D Deficiency, it is likely that you will need to be taking approximately 50,000 IU’s per week (about 7000 per day - addition mine) for 4 to 12 weeks. If you have SEVERE deficiency, then you may need to be taking Vitamin D Supplements as high as 50,000 IU’s per DAY for a month or even two months until getting a repeat Vitamin D Serum Level.
You should take 10 micrograms (400 IU) of vitamin D a day between October and early March to keep your bones and muscles healthy.
They also claim that anymore than 4000 IU is toxic:
Do not take more than 100 micrograms (4,000 IU) of vitamin D a day as it could be harmful.
This is despite the fact that studies routinely use even higher amounts (archive) without ill effect. In fact, if you explore the above list, you will see that benefits start to appear usually from at least 2000 IU per day and up to 20000 (or higher in single doses). 400 is an amount that would maybe do something for a mouse, certainly not a human. There's really no danger of poisoning yourself (archive) with Vitamin D:
[...] I have not seen one single case of it ("it" = Vitamin D poisoning - my addition) in over 10 years of being a nurse in intensive care units and emergency rooms in major cities.
[...] there is "no evidence of adverse effects from taking 10,000 IU of Vitamin D a day".
cases of vitamin D toxicity with hypercalcemia, for which the 25(OH)D concentration and vitamin D dose are known, all involve intake of (greater than or equal to) 40,000 IU/d
Even in the above case, only hypercalcemia is used as proof of toxicity (not any actual negative symptom), and it's a possibility that something else was impairing calcium metabolism (e.g lack of another mineral or vitamin). Extremely high Vitamin D amounts given to children appear to be harmless aside from the aforementioned temporary high blood calcium levels:
In fact, in East Germany between the 1940's and 1960's, children would ROUTINELY get 6 doses of 600,000 IU's of Vitamin D between birth and 18 months old.
A study called Intermittent High Dose Vitamin D During Infancy questioning this practice's safety noted that, while many of the children developed transient high levels of blood calcium levels, "...all the infants appeared healthy and repeated inquiries... have failed to identify clinical vitamin d toxicity as a result of the prophylactic program...".
The only cases of poisoning I've been able to find were the result of someone else's fuckup - such as supplements having a thousand times
the listed amount (archive) of the vitamin, or a doctor making a mistake in prescription (archive) so that the
patient took 30 times the amount she should have. Even with serious overdoses (archive) due to oversights, there are often no long-term effects -
No renal, cardiac, or
neurologic complications were noted.. In short, there's no reason to worry about Vitamin D toxicity unlike what the so-called medical authorities claim. Wow, this took long - now let's
move on to the other immune supporters:
Thus supplementation of healthy volunteers with a “selenium replete” status with 200 μg/d Se for 8 wk increased the ability of human peripheral blood lymphocytes to respond to stimulation with alloantigen (48). The sup- plementation regimen resulted in 118% increase in cytotoxic lymphocyte-mediated tumor cytotoxicity and 82.3% increase in natural killer cell activity as compared to baseline values.
An amyocarditic strain of coxsackievirus B3, CVB3/0, converted to virulence when it was inoculated into Se-deficient mice. This conversion was accompanied by changes in the genetic structure of the virus so that its genome closely resembled that of other known virulent CVB3 strains.
More recent research has shown that a mild strain of influenza virus, influenza A/Bangkok/1/79, also exhibits increased virulence when given to Se-deficient mice. This increased virulence is accompanied by multiple changes in the viral genome in a segment previously thought to be relatively stable.
Natural Killer (NK) cell activity was examined in a 16-month-old Japanese boy with Shwachman syndrome associated with severe vitamin E deficiency. As evaluated by 51Cr-release assay from K562 cells, NK cell activity was constantly decreased. After 8 weeks of oral alpha-tocopherol (alpha-Toc) supplementation (100 mg/day), NK cell activity had normalised. When alpha-Toc supplementation was interrupted for 16 weeks. NK cell activity again decreased.
Ascorbic acid was essential for the developmental progression of mouse bone marrow-derived progenitor cells to functional T-lymphocytes in vitro and also played a role in vivo.
As we expected, the levels of IFN-α and -β in BAL fluid and plasma from vitamin C-insufficient Gulo (-/-) mice were quiet lower than those in wild type and vitamin C-sufficient Gulo (-/-) mice (Fig. 3A and B). This result proves that vitamin C is an essential factor for the production of anti-vital immune response during the early phase of virus infection through the production of type I IFNs.
The patients with septic shock had lower vitamin C concentrations and higher C-reactive protein concentrations than the non-septic patients
This is despite receiving allegedly adequate amounts (might it be because they are not actually enough, and the authorities have lied again?):
These low vitamin C levels were apparent despite receiving recommended intakes via enteral and/or parenteral nutritional therapy (mean 125 mg/d).
Amongst the COVID-19 patients, 27 (57.4%) were found to be zinc deficient. These patients were found to have higher rates of complications (p = 0.009), acute respiratory distress syndrome (18.5% vs 0%, p = 0.06), corticosteroid therapy (p = 0.02), prolonged hospital stay (p = 0.05), and increased mortality (18.5% vs 0%, p = 0.06).
Fisher's exact test revealed that the experimental group 1.92% (N = 2) had significantly fewer symptomatic COVID-19 infections than the control group 10.42% (N = 10)
And if you do, it ensures they will be mild:
Of the two participants who developed COVID-19 infection, they had mild symptoms–cough, sore throat, low-grade fever, and generalized malaise. Both participants were managed in the outpatient service via telemedicine without complications. In the control group, there were nine cases of symptomatic COVID-19 infection, and three participants required hospital admission for severe hypoxemia, and one of these hospitalized participants died.
There is much more evidence if you care to look around. I think the overall trend is clear - the human immune system depends on nutrients. Lack of them kills it while replenishing them reactivates it. And we need all of them because they do different jobs. However, unlike with drugs - we do not need to know what exactly every nutrient does. Our bodies are so smart, you just need to provide the required nutrition and the body will know what to do with it. Science has spent lots of human effort and resources to try and find specific virus or bacteria cures. They are - of course - chasing their own tails if they don't take nutrition into account. There's no need to know the specifics of COVID-19 replication (archive) and such - because as I said before, the immune system is universal and - if well supported - will destroy all pathogens while we are none the wiser. Of course, modern medicine loves this "scientific" attitude because they can then develop drugs to block specific enzymes etc. and earn a lot of money while the people's health remains poor. It's all a big scam.
Food is the best (archive) - more absorbable and with no potential for toxicity. Supplements only as a last resort.
However, when the salmon was fried in vegetable oil, approximately 50% (123 IU of vitamin D3 was recovered.)- so just rely on the sun and supplements.
Realistically, our immune system should deal with infections with just the basics covered. However, sometimes you need that extra boost, and herbs can provide it in a safe way (unlike medical drugs or vaccines). Keep in mind that for the longest time humanity has lived in the wild, being dependent on the plants growing there. Eating those would have given them a constant dose of thousands of bioactive phytochemicals of which some have anti-infective properties. So, just including a variety of plants in your diet is a great way to try to replicate the ancient environment to which we're adapted to. But some plants are particularly effective - and we call the usage of those herbal medicine:
Definitely the King of immune supporters that can apparently kill any virus (archive) -
Almost every virus tested has not been able to withstand allicin, the active
ingredient produced when a fresh clove of garlic is crushed. Here's what the Encyclopedia of Herbal Medicine says about it:
Garlic has always been esteemed for its healing powers, and before the development of antibiotics it was a treatment for all manner of infections, from tuberculosis to typhoid.
Garlic is an excellent remedy for all types of chest infections. It is good for colds, flu, and ear infections
I have seen it destroy all bacteria, virus, fungus, worms and parasites, everything inside, and outside too. Garlic is the most potent killer of bacteria, virus and fungus, in fact any antigen/pathogen, stronger than any other herb.
Garlic is totally selective in its bacteria destruction, only killing bacteria that's harmful to our body. What is amazing is that, at the same time, garlic actually enhances our friendly bacteria and improves our intestinal flora and digestion. Garlic destroys many types of bacteria including Streptococcus, Staphylococcus, Typhoid, Diphtheria, cholera, bacterial dysentery (Traveller’s diarrhea), Tuberculosis, Tetanus, Rheumatic bacteria, and many others. But, that's not all, garlic is also an extremely potent anti-viral agent. Garlic has been tested against many viruses and is known to destroy on contact the viruses that cause Measles, Mumps, Mononucleosis (Epstein-Barr), Chicken pox, Herpes simplex #1 and #2, Herpes Zoster, Viral Hepatitis, scarlet fever, Rabies and others. But still, that's not all. Garlic's anti-fungal ability is second to none. In the laboratory, it has proven to be more potent than any known antifungal agent including Nystatin. Garlic will regulate the overgrowth of Candida albicans and positively kill ringworm.
It helps the body create more immune blood cells, actually increases T-cell counts, helps increase macrophage production and activity (eating ability), stimulates production of interferon and interleukin I, and it seems to protect cells from invasion.
Echinacea and Garlic are a dynamite duo and I highly suggest they be used together. I suggest anyone on Echinacea consume at least 3 cloves of garlic a day, also.
I had a woman come into my clinic who had an infected, swollen sore throat for 3 1/2 months and the doctors had given her every drug and antibiotic under the sun; nothing worked. Her immune system was shot. She used Echinacea tincture for 2 days and it was gone and never came back. I have had patients with chronic infections for years get almost instant results using Echinacea only for a few days.
And from the Encyclopedia:
Clinical research into echinacea has confirmed that it increases the number of white blood cells and their strength of action, although its precise mode of action on immune function is not well understood. The polysaccharides inhibit the ability of viruses to take over cells, while the alkylamides are antibacterial and antifungal. Research supports the use of echinacea to prevent colds and respiratory infections resulting from air travel.
Echinacea is a key remedy in Western herbal medicine, and is used to treat many health problems, notably viral and fungal infections, and skin infections such as acne and boils. It makes an excellent gargle for throat infections, and is typically prescribed by herbalists wherever the immune system is underperforming.
You could say Garlic is the sword and Echinacea the shield in the fight against infectious diseases. But herbal medicine still has more to offer:
This one is specific for respiratory infections (what COVID-19 is alleged to be). From the Encyclopedia again:
The herb is an antiseptic and is very helpful for colds, flu, and sore throats.
Eucalyptus is a strong expectorant, suitable for chest infections, including bronchitis and pneumonia.
The diluted essential oil, applied to the skin as a chest or sinus rub, has a warming and slightly anesthetic effect, helping to relieve respiratory infections. The same effect occurs when the infusion or tincture is used as a gargle.
Calms down the immune system when it has become overactive. Weakens the damage from infections that have already got in. From the Encyclopedia:
Research has established that turmeric, and curcumin in particular, blocks several different inflammatory pathways, countering inflammation throughout the body.
Turmeric is largely taken as a supplement to prevent or treat cancer, dementia, and many auto- immune diseases.
According to the paper,3 "Potential Inhibitor of COVID-19 Main Protease (Mpro) From Several Medicinal Plant Compounds by Molecular Docking Study," posted March 13, 2020, on preprints.org, curcumin and demethoxycurcumin were two compounds (found in turmeric - addition mine) among several that were found to inhibit COVID-19 Mpro.
Studies have also shown curcumin has an inhibitory effect on virus-induced cytokine storms, which occur as a result of an overproduction of immune cells and pro-inflammatory cytokines. This too suggests it may be of particular use against COVID-19, considering the cytokine storm triggered in severe and critical COVID-19 infection is what ends up killing these patients.
Decreases length of hospital stay. From this study:
Additionally, when classified by prior medical conditions, ginger-supplemented participants showed significant improvement in hospital stays regardless of their prior health status; where the estimated difference was 3.8 days [95% CI 2.5–5.2 d] in individuals with prior medical conditions and 1.8 days [95% CI 0.8–2.8 d] in participants without pre-existing medical conditions, respectively.
Besides, our subgroup analysis highlighted the importance of ginger supplement to older adults, where the hospitalization time could be shortened to less than half of their un-supplemented comparisons, which could effectively reduce the suffering and pain and improve the life quality of the elderly.
The worse condition you are in, the more the treatment helps. The study annoyingly shills the severity of the "pandemic" and the effectiveness of vaccines; this seems to be a requirement to publish these days. But whatever, the information is still useful.
Chokeberry juice inactivated about 97% of SARS-CoV-2 after 5 min, while green tea and pomegranate juice inactivated about 80% of the virus.
Keep in mind this is a culture study, so not as good as an actual human study would be, but still - it's much better evidence than what the fearmongers have for their useless measures. WHO, of course, has shat on herbal medicine as a treatment for COVID-19, prefering masks, lockdowns and vaccines which don't work. Should we laugh or cry?
May have when the amount of evidence is massive (versus zero for their useless measures). Ha ha ha. Anyway, since this isn't a report about herbal medicine, I
think I'll finish this here. There are more antiviral herbs than the ones I mentioned, such as cinnamon, oregano, or lemon. For the purposes of the argument, I've also assumed that COVID-19 is actually an infectious disease - even though it's usually the co-morbidities that end up doing you in. There are herbs for chronic diseases as well, and the COVID-19
fearmongers - by ignoring or attacking these extremely effective remedies - have exposed themselves as enemies of your health. To learn more, read the Encyclopedia of
Herbal Medicine, visit Richard Schulze's webpage, or look up herbal remedies by action on sites such as Herbpathy. Scientific studies can be found on e.g GreenMedInfo.
We've conclusively proven that corona response had nothing whatsoever to do with your health. What was the point of it all, then? Let's go through the things that have happened as a result of the fake pandemic:
For example, in Manchester (archive) - but really all over the world. Obviously a way to deny people the ability to meet their families in other countries. Teaches you that someone else controls where and when you can move.
Across the full sample, 43% of businesses had temporarily closed, and nearly all of these closures were due to COVID-19.
Our results also highlight the financial fragility of many businesses. The median firm with monthly expenses over $10,000 had only enough cash on hand to last roughly 2 wk. Three-quarters of respondents only had enough cash on hand to last 2 mo or less.*
Big international corpos can avoid this fate due to having money saved up as well as their bigger online presence. From the point of view of the customer, it restricts the stuff they're able to do. No more going to the restaurant, the barber, the doctor. Just have to rely on what you yourself are able to do. Also takes away jobs and makes people dependent on government handouts, in preparation for the AI takeover that will likely make many people homeless.
Really, a better way to call this would be house arrest. Same reason as the travel bans, but much more restrictive.
Coronavirus quarantine enforced for all people entering Australia,
lockdowns on the table (archive)
Coronavirus quarantine rule prompts WA threat of $50,000 penalty as panic buying intensifies (archive)
Coronavirus: All New Zealand's confirmed COVID-19 cases to be put in quarantine facilities from now on
Electronic wristband to ensure stay-home notice: Quarantine monitoring devices being used by others worldwide (archive)
And don't you dare defy it!
Masks have a symbolic meaning of shutting your mouth, so it teaches you that you don't have a say. Also, much of human communication is through facial expressions, and the masks destroy that. You now have no idea whether the person next to you is angry, scared, serious or making a joke, etc. which surely isn't good for social connections. The authorities really need you to wear your muzzle, you good doggie you:
Venezuela Is Forcing People Who Are Caught Not Wearing Masks
Into Hard Labor (archive)
Pepper the robot can politely suggest you wear a damn mask
LA County Mayor Says Not Wearing A Mask Is "Act Of Domestic Terrorism" (archive)
Get more information about you, train you to accept more surveillance in preparation for worse (AI CCTV, microchips, etc...)
Australia to allow contact tracers to access credit card transaction data
Iran Launched an App That Claimed to Diagnose Coronavirus. Instead, It Collected Location Data on Millions of People (archive)
Google considers sharing location of user movements with governments to provide social distancing data (archive)
Singapore confirms that police can access coronavirus contact tracing data (archive)
Destroy friendships, families, social connections in general. Create a world where everyone is suspicious of the other guy.
Simple - can't have people do independent research. All must buy into the fearmongering narrative! These headlines should say it all:
Vietnam introduces 'fake
news' fines for coronavirus misinformation (archive)
UN Recruits 110,000 Social Media Influencers To Correct Online COVID Wrongthink (archive)
Australian woman arrested for "incitement" over anti-lockdown Facebook post (archive)
And again, teaches you that someone else controls what you can or can't say.
However, the agency did say it's "advisable to use contactless payments to reduce the risk of transmission," the Telegraph reports.
...they want to reach cashless society, which will allow the banks to have a database of all our purchases, block certain ones, reduce social credit according to them, apply fines, or even "erase" a person. More here.
By looking at the punishments for not being vaccinated, we can see that this issue is really important to the ruling class:
COVID vaccine refusal could result in ban from going to work
French Law Would Ban People Who Don’t Get COVID Vaccine From Using Public Transport (archive)
Five years imprisonment and/or a $66,600 fine for refusing coronavirus vaccination? (archive)
Qantas CEO Alan Joyce says proof of COVID-19 vaccination will be a condition of international air travel (archive)
Here’s how an RNA vaccine works: rather than injecting a pathogen’s antigen into your body, you instead give the body the genetic code needed to produce that antigen itself
Note: I did not claim here that DNA will be permanently altered. However, according to this doctor, that is a possibility. I've transcribed the relevant part of the interview (skipping stuff I couldn't understand or didn't think matters):
So, RNA can be transcribed...about 6 or 7% of our DNA is retroviral DNA, and this messenger RNA can be transcribed. SARS itself has been shown now, they just wrote a paper that it can transcribe into our own genome...so clearly if the virus can do it, the vaccine can do it cause it's, it's what we're using, we're using a part of the virus, the spike protein, to make the vaccine. So, we're seeing transcription into our own DNA. So, could it happen? Of course it can happen cause it's happened with the actual virus itself. It means this messenger RNA goes into your body and then accidentally...you could design it on purpose but we'll assume they're not designing it that way on purpose, but accidentally get transcribed into your own DNA. That's what retroviruses do.
[Question:] what does it mean if I was Dr. Evil and like the most sinister person in the world?
[Answer:] What it means is you'll have chronic COVID-19 your whole life. We're thinking, potentially, and this is not just about the vaccine only, alright? But the vaccine could definitely do the same thing. We think that some of these people have extended COVID-19, it's because it's transcribing into DNA...Back into the 1990s, they were excited cause you could cure cancer this way, insert a gene code into the body to maybe get over inborn error of metabolism, so yeah, this is Dr. Evil stuff, potentially. Hopefully these guys aren't doing that.
However, even if the vaccine will
not have an effect on DNA, it's still getting your body to
directly execute external instructions. And since
(as the above links show) you will become a second class citizen
without the vaccine - the vast majority of people will take it. And
the fearmongers could easily create a vaccine that will make your
own body produce any kind of protein (not just
the corona spike protein) including ones that kill fertility
(experiments on that have
long been done - archive)
or possibly inhibit certain traits - such as
rebelliousness or courage. There is now scientific
that RNA from COVID (and thus presumably the mRNA vaccines which
contain it) can get integrated into your DNA.
UPDATE March 2022: forget the
presumably, we now have
scientific proof (archive):
"We also show that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure."
And once genetic modification is on the table, anything is possible.
Unvaccinated tennis player Novak Djokovic was kicked out of the 2022 Australian Open (one of the 4 most important tournaments of the season) despite having a valid (archive) (accepted by a court) medical exemption. Only because a COVID cucked immigration minister Alex Hawke thought Novak will cause an
increase in anti-vaccination sentiment and reversed the court's decision. Do you now realize what this
pandemic was all about? They truly made a great example out of him, even kept him in a torture cell (archive) for 4 days. The uncompliant must be derided at every occassion. And the fact that they had to shove him around, instead of just telling him "bro, the unvaccinated are not allowed, see you" proves their psychopathy.
Anyway, the above is a rewrite of my old Mastodon post that's now gone because the instance has been deleted. It shows us that even really big celebrities will not avoid the abuse by the psychopaths who rule the world. And they are everywhere - in the media, politics, sports organizations. I recommend dropping sports if you still care about them, since they are all compromised. Djokovic - by the way - still did not end up taking the vaccine, and so is kind of a hero. The psychos took away two of his chances for Grand Slams, and maybe his chance for being the best tennis player in history - but he's still marching on as the proud pureblood. There are more important things in life than "success".
Looking at the above, can we come up with an overall description for what the ruling class is planning to do with the corona response? I think we can. The measures enacted (masks, social distancing, lockdowns, quarantines, travel bans, online jobs, tracking apps, censorship, forced vaccines) all heavily violate our freedom or dignity. The massive punishments for resisting those destroy our spirits and create learned helplessness. This is where Stockholm Syndrome comes into play as a defense mechanism. When you're being abused and can't see a way out, a common response is to pretend your abuser is actually your friend. But for that to work, there needs to exist a justification for the abuse. And I can't come up with a better one than an invisible, deadly and contagious monster that requires all those extreme measures to stop. It has worked extremely well:
87% of Poles and 79% of Brits support their respective governments' COVID-19 measures. I'm sure most of the other countries would have similar figures. This is exactly the kind of mindset the ruling class needs for their plans to be realized without inhibitions. Anyway, in the old version of the report I've said this:
I must say - "the coronavirus" has been amazingly successful at bringing us closer to all the above - but it's not enough. They will need a few more fake pandemics, school shootings, terrorist attacks, child porn scandals, environmental disasters, etc. which are all staged for this exact purpose. The main barrier is our mentality - which must be fully transformed into a helpless, cucked, Stockholm Syndrome one - before they can implement all their policies unchallenged. This is why they spend so much effort on scaremongering - you must have the idea that resistance is futile and to "trust the experts" forced into your head 24 / 7 until it sticks. The strategy seems to be working
Now it's obvious I've underestimated the severity of the situation. Sure, they will keep running other scams, but it's clear that they went all in on the fake pandemic. We can see this from the extreme punishments unleashed on people who dare to resist. But we also have direct proof from the so-called Great Reset (archive) initiative. What is the Great Reset?
Just the New World Order rebranded. Finally, the ruling class admits they want to globally change the way the world works. The conspiracy theorists were right
all along! However, to do that, they've needed an excuse and corona provides a perfect one. Now, the plan is of course portrayed as a positive, with slogans such as
Reset ourselves to
become agents of change, not just passive receivers of briefs and
Reset our work so what we create promotes sustainable values, attitudes and behaviours. Let's see what is
actually hiding behind those:
There's no vaccine for the infodemic - so how can we combat the virus of misinformation? (archive)
In a world where social media is increasingly where most of us get so much of our information, and where we value freedom of speech as a cornerstone of democracy, what can be done to combat dangerous misinformation?
1984-style newspeak! Censorship is freedom!
Is the world up to the challenge of mass COVID-19 vaccination? (archive)
As vaccine capacity ramps up , we face a task of unprecedented scale to ensure an inclusive, safe and sustainable distribution to reach frontline healthcare workers, at-risk groups and eventually all people around the world.
Hear that? Everyone's getting the vax!
Bill Gates: Data could help us stop Alzheimer's (archive)
Instead of having to navigate dozens of individual databases, scientists will be able to access and upload information to a patient database from around the world.
A worldwide database of health information? That's totally not abusable! Sign me up!
We urgently need a Global Data Convention. Here’s why (archive)
A Global Data Convention would constitute an integrated set of data principles and standards that unite national governments, public institutions, private sector, civil society organizations and academia. These universal principles and standards would set out the elements of responsible and ethical handling and sharing of data and the global institution or institutions that would provide incentives for applying these principles and overseeing their consistent application across different communities. Any such convention would need to address privacy of personal data, access to data, the exchange of data, data interoperability and data transparency, to name a few.
Pretend to want to use your data in a
responsible and ethical way, but actually shamelessly use it for their own purposes. The same crap Mozilla has
pulled, this time on a world scale.
Coronavirus vaccine: How will it affect the future of flying (archive)
No vaccine = no travel!
5 lasting changes from the COVID-19 pandemic (archive)
If you read the article, four of those refer to moving things to the digital sphere. The ruling class loves this so that they can control people easier and push the merge with machine (so-called transhumanism).
Welcome to 2030. I own nothing, have no privacy, and life has never been better (archive)
Headline should say it all! So we end up with global information control, tracking, lack of bodily ownership, data collection on an unprecedented scale, no property, spread of SJW ideology, increased digitization, etc. None of those would be accepted without the corona response first causing Stockholm Syndrome in people. There is more, of course. A whole book called COVID-19: The Great Reset even exists (that I didn't read, but might take a look at sometime...). Recall that the World Economic Forum are the same people that gave us Event-201, proving this was all planned.
Anyway, it's clear the NWO / Great Reset is now not just in the conspiracy theorists' imaginations, but actively being realized. And they've even graciously given us a date - 2030 - until which we have to stop it. But, of course, with the Stockholm Syndromization of the people (caused by the COVID-19 measures), they've ensured we won't do shit. Worse than that - even if the populace eventually uncucked itself, it might be too late to resist with systems such as AI surveillance, social credit, smart homes, microchips, mind links, digital payments, murder drones, etc. widely in place. See Technological slavery.
The eventual endgame, I think, is depopulation. This can be easily seen by the fact of how the authorities haven't cared about the lives of people during this fake pandemic at all. Now, they can't just barge in and start killing everyone; after all, we heavily outnumber them and you'd think that - even with how cucked the populace has gotten - we'd do something at that point. And so, they need more stealthy ways of reducing the population. Corona provides them a few good ones (such as homelessness, suicides, vaccine "side effects" and postponed doctor visits). Slowly but surely, they will include more direct ways of doing so (boiling frog strategy). But what is the actual point of depopulation?
Mike Adams, the guy who runs Natural News, has once come up with an interesting theory in one of his videos (I can't find it now so this might be more my own take on things). All the stuff the globalists are doing is meant to kill off the weak, stupid, lazy, unhealthy, socially useless, etc people. Remember that it's most often the psychopaths that rise to power (archive), and a Hunger Games-style competition to weed out the weak is their idea of fun. This would fit right in with the fake pandemic considering the suicides, denied operations, evictions, etc. So, when the depopulation agenda is finally realized, all that's left will be the best humanity has to offer. Then, those remaining smart, healthy, strong, driven people will be able to focus in propelling humanity to great heights, with space exploration, transhumanism, etc. without worrying about the useless eaters getting in the way.
At least, that's how the ruling class would think about it. To them, the regular person is a cockroach unless they prove themselves according to their criteria, of course. In reality, the depopulation agenda would mostly affect poor people regardless of any other traits. And maybe some people prefer a way of life that is less technological, more spiritual, etc. and don't care about participating in the elites' stupid game. Those, too, would not survive the purge. Whatever the explanation, the fact that the globalists are doing depopulation can't be denied at this point.
I was about to finish up this report, but I've got an idea which should bury the official story once and for all (without drowning yourself with yet more sources or explanations). Recall the list of things I've posted in the Mozilla report that they would have done if they cared about the stuff they espouse? I'm going to try to do something similar here - what would have actually happened if this was a real (not engineered) pandemic that was claiming all these lives, endangering humanity and that the authorities are earnestly trying to stop? Let's just get to it:
Even the evil Mozilla has at least put (weak) tracking protection in their browser by default since I've posted the list (but have brought in some new malicious stuff, of course). On the other hand, in the COVID-19 case the authorities did absolutely nothing that helps people and a shitload that hurts them. When even the fucking Devil (Mozilla) has more ethics than you, you know you're really special. Anyway, I suspected this pandemic was fake news right from the beginning (knowing that the spooks have pulled off similar scams before) - but there was still some doubt lingering around in my mind. Now, I am absolutely sure this is only a PSY-OP. Since starting this, I've seen zero evidence to support the official story and no justifications for what the authorities are doing. Nothing I've read and none of the people I've talked to were able to show me anything substantial. In fact, the deeper I dig, the more damning information I find and the whole thing just seems like a sick joke. For me, I think the investigation of this increasingly smelly pile of cow dung is done (UPDATE: of course, I did not keep promise - just way too much great info appeared to ignore it). Now, all that remains is to wait for the aftermath and hope we can get through it with some freedom still remaining. Let me end on this note, and have a nice day ^_^.
This is the tl;dr version of the report (read the whole thing you lazy bum):
I was supposed to finish up, but must get this out of my system. Straight from the heart ^__^
They either get completely consumed by the mainstream media brainwashing, ignore the issue (but follow the restrictions anyway), or pick a conspiracy theory to follow - not realizing that many of them are controlled opposition released by the fearmongers themselves. Very few people care to dig deep!
I will anger some of the worshippers with this, but whatever. Pages upon pages of nonsense have been written about corona in the scientific journals. Despite this, we can't answer simple questions such as how many infectious viral particles are released by breathing, coughing or sneezing; how many are required to infect someone; how far do they travel with each type of exhalation, what is the effect of a strong versus weak immune system on the above factors - and many others. I mean, these are the essentials we NEEDED to have known before implementing any kind of restrictions! But of course, just because someone is a scientist doesn't mean they are not an idiot - therefore, the journals will keep being filled with crap while the basics are still not adequately answered.
They could be telling us total fakes, and we can't do shit to verify it besides some roundabout ways (such as comparing it to other countries - but what if they are all lying?). There is zero transparency in government. Citizens should have access to all the data upon which the measures were based, as well as how exactly it was collected, etc.
Such as Neil Ferguson, upon whose (now clearly disproven) model the UK based their lockdowns. Merkel and any of the other politicians who have implemented baseless restrictions in their countries. All the media talking heads and whoever writes their scripts. The vaccine producers and pushers. If these vermin could actually be punished for their destructive decisions, maybe they'd think a bit before making them and this circus would long have stopped (or never happened in the first place). See also The Enemy Who Surpasses The Law.
Just look at how they can digitally disappear anyone with a snap of their fingers - even the fucking president of America (not that I care about the guy, or believe he isn't a puppet - but still). And so, the narrative is totally controlled except for the very small amount of tech-savvy people capable of using alternative platforms (for which their audience will be low, anyway, so it doesn't exactly fix the problem).
Very few will stand up (even with something as simple as not wearing a mask), and none in a way that really matters.
Give me liberty or give me death - nice quote
that nobody actually believes in!
The topic is obviously massive - there are people with similar perspectives, covering stuff that I haven't or from a slightly different angle. Let me list some of those. Edit: removed some of the sources, because they either died or didn't meet my quality standards. Remember, I started writing this report right at the beginning of the "pandemic", so there weren't that many skeptical sources out there - so I just listed them all. Now I think I've managed to stick most of the relevant information into my own report. But added two other decent sources, anyway. There are surely many more, so search around if you still feel you need them.
Back to the front page